The 4 September edition of BBC News at Ten covered Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs) in such a way that it was unrecognisable for those who watched the exchange live. Even the chief features writer at the pro-establishment Financial Times, Henry Mance, clocked the obscene bias:
Funny old world – nearly everyone who watched PMQs live thought Boris Johnson was disastrous, but watching the BBC’s 10 o’clock news, you would think he’d won it.
— Henry Mance (@henrymance) September 4, 2019
Many people pointed out the significance of this:
It really says something when a senior FT journalist points out that BBC News is misleading the public with its pro-Johnson bias. https://t.co/V0IPPA6DgO
— Tom Kibasi (@TomKibasi) September 4, 2019
Our Prime Minister, sitting in the House of Commons and using openly homophobic language towards Corbyn, calling him a big girl's blouse, and refusing to apologise for his own racism by deflecting with his diverse cabinet and his apparent ancestors.
Get him the fuck out. #PMQs
— jenn (@JenniThorburn) September 4, 2019
Even pro-austerity former Tories appeared to declare the end of the party:
After a pitiful performance in his first #PMQs #BorisJohnson we are now subjected to an embarrassing debut as Chancellor from @sajidjavid no wonder @Conservatives MPs sitting behind them both look so glum. A once great party rendered to an incompetent right wing rump.
— Anna Soubry MP (@Anna_Soubry) September 4, 2019
Centrists weren’t impressed either:
So many of Boris Johnson's worst character flaws on display at #PMQs. He's thin skinned and easily riled. He can't cope with a hostile audience that won't laugh at his attempts at jokes. And he tends to wing it rather than put the work in to prepare
— Tom Copley (@tomcopley) September 4, 2019
End of #PMQs. Snap verdict: Johnson is crap. And also toast.
— Jonathan Lis (@jonlis1) September 4, 2019
My centrist Tory (formerly) voting Dad said "Corbyn made Johnson look like a child at #PMQs today," and I am here for it. 🙌🙌🙌
Ps in summer he said he will never vote for the Tories again
— Jack D 🌷🌹 (@JackDunc1) September 4, 2019
#PMQs leaves millions of Brits confused, as traditionally questions are followed by some sort of answer.
— Have I Got News For You (@haveigotnews) September 4, 2019
— Adam Bienkov (@AdamBienkov) September 4, 2019
But the BBC News at Ten team apparently didn’t get the memo. Because they seemed to cherry-pick the best moments for Johnson and place them next to the worst parts for Corbyn:
Here's how BBC News at 10 covered for Boris Johnson's clusterfuck of a maiden #PMQs.
Clipped the only passable moments for Johnson and placed it next to Corbyn's most benign assertions: pic.twitter.com/IqBqiZfdSm
— James Wright (@wrightismight) September 5, 2019
For example, the BBC amplified Johnson’s line that Corbyn is preventing a general election (rather than trying to ensure Johnson cannot deliver a no-deal Brexit through the backdoor):
There’s only one chlorinated chicken that I can see in this house, and he’s on that bench.
Not looking good for Johnson
At present, Johnson looks trapped and unable to govern despite being prime minister. Given he no longer has a majority, a general election is likely around the corner. On 4 September, Johnson called a motion for one. But Labour says it abstained because Corbyn wants to bring about an election on its own terms, perhaps through a no-confidence vote.
That cannot come soon enough. We need to prevent a damaging no-deal Brexit. But it’s worth noting that it’s only trade policy. Ending austerity, delivering a Green Industrial Revolution, and regulating the financial sector are a must. And only Corbyn’s Labour can achieve these critical aims.
Featured image via BBCiplayer
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?