• Donate
  • Login
Thursday, July 16, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result
  • Editorial
  • Explainer
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Environment
  • Feature
  • Food
  • Health
  • Science
  • Skwawkbox
  • UK

As Luciana Berger becomes the latest arrival, the Lib Dems get caught out lying

John Ranson by John Ranson
5 September 2019
in Trending, UK
Reading Time: 2 mins read
163 10
A A
5
Home Trending
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

The ranks of the Liberal Democrats have swelled further with the arrival of Luciana Berger. But even as the party celebrated, people were quick to point out that it had overstated its hand.

In February 2019, Berger was one of the founders of what was then called ‘The Independent Group’. In June, she and several others left what was now Change UK. Today, she joins former Change UK colleagues Sarah Wollaston (originally Tory) and Chuka Umunna (originally Labour) becoming one of 16 Lib Dem MPs now in parliament.

Big claim

Understandably, the Lib Dems were cock-a-hoop:

Welcome to our newest MP – @lucianaberger !

The Liberal Democrats are surging – we're the biggest, strongest Remain party. The time for action is now

Join todayhttps://t.co/xOHtAN8CQ2

— Liberal Democrats (@LibDems) September 5, 2019

But the party’s dodgy claim to be “the biggest, strongest Remain party” didn’t go unchallenged:

With 16 MPs almost half of whom have "borrowed gowns"? Will that last past the election? By the way SNP is the biggest remain party

— Information Hub (@Multi_Facet) September 5, 2019

You're still 21 seats behind the SNP.

— Liam McReanan (@LiamMcReanan) September 5, 2019

SNP.

— Jack Faulkner (@Jackcantsleep1) September 5, 2019

And it’s true. Not only does the SNP have 35 MPs to the Lib Dems’ 16, it also has a larger membership. According to the latest figures, the Lib Dems have “around 115,000” members, compared to the SNP’s 125,500. So the only possible sense in which the Lib Dems could be bigger would be in geographical reach, as the SNP focuses on Scotland. But that’s probably not what they meant.

Uneasy coalition

And there was a further challenge to the celebratory mood:

https://twitter.com/nickfiggis/status/1169567282726670337

On 3 September, Tory MP Phillip Lee dramatically marched over to the opposition benches and sat down next to Lib Dem leader Jo Swinson. As with Berger, the Lib Dems celebrated gaining an MP. And as with Berger, the Lib Dems inaccurately claimed to be “the biggest party of Remain”. But there was also anger from Lib Dem members:

https://twitter.com/A_C_McGregor/status/1168905831703875592

Plenty of members don't think this is fantastic news. Obviously we're happy to see parliamentary numbers grow but Lee does not have a voting record a liberal would be even remotely proud of…

— Someone calling themselves Chris Whiting (@ChrisRWhiting) September 3, 2019

In fact, the arrival of Lee was too much to take for chair of the party’s LGBT+ group Jennie Rigg:

The chair of LGBT Lib Dems quits the party in response to Philip Lee joining.

“A homophobe, a xenophobe, and someone who thinks people should be barred from the country if they are ill.

Fuck this.
Fuck this so hard.” https://t.co/CBcd0LZTPA

— Oliver Cooper (@OliverCooper) September 3, 2019

Rigg voiced her thoughts on her blog, announcing that she was leaving the party in response to it allowing Lee to join.

This begs the question: will Swinson’s apparent policy of welcome for any homeless pro-Remain MP make the party ‘bigger’ and ‘stronger’, or will it have the opposite effect?

Featured image via Wikimedia – Chris McAndrew / YouTube – Guardian News

Share129Tweet81ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

Jeremy Corbyn just achieved what the British establishment said was never possible

Next Post

Even a Financial Times journo clocked the obscene bias on last night’s News at Ten

Next Post
Jeremy Corbyn and Laura Kuenssberg

Even a Financial Times journo clocked the obscene bias on last night’s News at Ten

As his government falls apart, Johnson chooses to meet an alleged war criminal

The Sun scores a massive own goal by openly treating its English readers like mugs

The Sun scores a massive own goal by openly treating its English readers like mugs

Johnson accused of ‘abusing’ police with Trumpian political stunt in Yorkshire

Johnson accused of 'abusing' police with Trumpian political stunt in Yorkshire

Boris Johnson overpays for box of cod during fish market visit

Comments 5

  1. Quinch says:
    7 years ago

    Can you please educate yourself on the correct use of “begs the question”.
    This is not it.
    Perhaps use “raises the question” instead.
    You are journalists, this is pretty basic.

    Reply
    • Shaolin12 says:
      7 years ago

      Take a chill-pill dude.

      What a pointless, and hypocritical thing to write, your grammar is terrible, and your punctuation is poor too.

      1) most readers of this post would get the gist of the phrase “begs the question”.

      2) you are very rude demanding that the writer educate themselves just because you do not like their choice of phraseology, particularly as it is clear from your own words, that you do not posses the necessary linguistic skills to judge.

      3) you wrote – “Can you please educate yourself on the correct use of “begs the question”.”. This is grammatically incorrect, and should read ‘Can you please educate yourself ABOUT the correct usage of “begs the question” ‘.

      4) you wrote – “This is not it”. This is divorced from the demand you just made due to your punctuation, and as such is meaningless. What you should have written is this ;-

      ‘Can you please educate yourself about the correct usage of “begs the question” ‘, this is not it. Or, ‘Can you please educate yourself about the correct usage of “begs the question” as this is not correct. There are of course other ways of expressing the same.

      5) you wrote – “Perhaps use “raises the question” instead.”. – This too is divorced from the previous wording due to punctuation, and as you are not quoting someone else, “”raises the question”” should read as raises the question or ‘raises the question’.

      6) you have suggested to the author of this article that they use different phrasing to that which was used, however in your wisdom and experience, you have not explained why “begs the question” is the wrong phrase to use in this context.

      What is your problem with the usage of “begs the question”? Please elucidate, and help to make us all wiser.

      7) you wrote “You are journalists, this is pretty basic”, so an obvious question coming up … are you a journalist, an English language teacher, or at least someone with the requisite qualifications to make such a demand?, and also, what constitutes being pretty basic? Is this something you know to be taught at a basic level in Journalism?, maybe it is ‘Journalism 101’?, if so, please enlighten us.

      Personally I think you are just being a troll, or are having a bad day, and felt the need to irritably lash out , and even though my English language skills are not superlative, and open to further development, they are certainly better than yours.

      However, let me be clear about this, John Ranson’s Journalistic and English language skills are better than both of ours put together, another point you seemed to miss.

      This was also a grammatical error on your part, as well as a sign of poor observation, as this is not a ‘The Canary’ article, but a John Ranson article posted on The Canary, hence your “You are journalists, this is pretty basic.” comment is clearly aimed at The Canary as if The Canary is responsible for writing John Ranson’s article.

      All in all, if you feel it necessary to be ultra-picky about another person’s usage of the English language (particularly as it was literally the last phrase in an entire article), make sure your own posts are scrupulously clear of mistakes, and be prepared for someone else to point out your own errors in response if you don’t.

      Reply
      • Mystea says:
        7 years ago

        Haha – someone’s just been OWNED! Better luck next time, Quinch…

        Reply
        • Quinch says:
          7 years ago

          I fail to see how I was “owned”. I certainly didn’t need 3 pages to make my point.
          The correct response was, “I will do better in future”.
          In a world where serial liars are trying to change the meaning of words The Canary should at least attempt to be accurate.
          Grammar is not the issue.
          Try not to exhaust yourself with more excuses.

          Reply
      • Quinch says:
        7 years ago

        I never claimed to be a journalist.
        I can also accept a mistake without deflection.
        I do hope your fingers are tired.

        Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Terrorism
Skwawkbox

14yo charged with terror offence for alleged plan to attack mosques

by Skwawkbox
15 July 2026
Cardiff University
Skwawkbox

Cardiff Uni student assaulted by security staff for holding Palestine flag

by Skwawkbox
15 July 2026
Trump
Global

Trump’s hyped national guard deployments did absolutely nothing to lower crime

by Joe Glenton
15 July 2026
PPE
News

Unions and anti-corruption campaigners react to damning Covid Inquiry report

by Grace
15 July 2026
Burnham
Skwawkbox

‘What about Israeli terrorists?’ — Burnham ‘ratioed’ for supporting IRGC ban

by Skwawkbox
15 July 2026

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

Complaints and Corrections

About the Canary

Meet the Team

© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Ok

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart