On last night’s Question Time, Fiona Bruce’s BBC ‘impartiality’ mask slipped for one revealing moment

Fiona Bruce and Brandon Lewis on BBC Question Time
Tracy Keeling

During BBC Question Time on 12 September, host Fiona Bruce’s mask slipped for one revealing moment. The public broadcaster makes much of its commitment to “due impartiality” in its output. But one brief exchange between Bruce and Home Office minister Brandon Lewis on the programme has got people up in arms. Because many saw the playful “teasing” in it as an anathema to the adversarial relationship the media should have with those in power.

Just teasing you

As per usual, Brexit featured heavily as a topic on Question Time. One question in the programme, however, focused less on the current government’s handling of the issue and more on the PM who started the debacle: David Cameron:


That led audience members to share their thoughts on Cameron, who promised an EU referendum in 2013 and delivered it in 2016.

One woman brought up the fact that Cameron – who campaigned to remain – pledged to stay in his post no matter what the outcome of the vote. Following her comment, Bruce asked Lewis whether he wished Cameron had stood by that pledge:

But as Liam Lavery pointed out, Bruce then stopped the “struggling” Lewis in his tracks as he tried to answer the question. As she did so, she patted him on the arm, smiled, and said, “I’m teasing you, I’m teasing you”. Lavery wasn’t the only viewer who was taken aback by the exchange either:

Double standards

Although it was a fleeting moment in the show, it speaks volumes. Because it demonstrated a lighthearted, good-natured playfulness between the BBC host and her Conservative minister panellist. A whimsicality which is generally missing from Bruce’s interaction with Labour shadow ministers. And it’s a chumminess that certainly isn’t conducive to the adversarial relationship journalists should have with those who wield political power.

Featured image via BBC

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us