Independent Media | Campaigning Journalism
The outrageous new audience selection policy BBC Question Time revealed last night
BBC Question Time revealed an outrageous new policy for audience selection on 16 January.
Apparently, following the Conservative Party gaining a substantial majority at the 2019 general election, the BBC will no longer select audiences to “reflect a broad range of political views”. Instead, the broadcaster is now choosing audience members based on “the current political picture” in the country where the episode takes place. On 16 January, that ensured Liverpool – an area of England where voters delivered only Labour MPs at the election – was represented by an audience of “more Conservative than Labour supporters”.
Worse still, host Fiona Bruce tried to pass it off as the BBC‘s standard practice.
As usual?
After introducing the programme’s panellists, Bruce said:
As usual, our audience has been selected to reflect the current political picture, depending where we are. So here in England that means there are more Conservative than Labour supporters plus a smaller number from other parties.
But there’s nothing “usual” about this selection process. The BBC‘s own web page on frequently asked questions says:
Question Time selects local audiences which reflect a broad range of political views. … This is to ensure a range of views are represented in the audience. …
As with the make-up of the panels, Question Time is aiming to achieve due impartiality in the membership of the audience across the series as a whole, rather than being confined to an exact mathematical formula for each programme.
The standard line
Indeed, the BBC has faced criticism in the past for its audience make-up. In May 2019, SNP deputy leader Keith Brown accused the broadcaster of doing an episode in Scotland that was “stuffed full of Tory plants”.
Bizarre moment when Fiona Bruce asks the audience who supports the SNP and 7 people put their hands up. Out of about 80 people in shot.
Current polls show @theSNP on 40% support in Scotland. pic.twitter.com/lqENykzMpx
— Leo Mikłasz (@leomiklasz) May 16, 2019
In response to the 2019 criticism, the BBC stuck to its actual “usual” line in this instance, rather than the new one Bruce alleged was standard, saying:
There is a selection process to ensure a range of views are heard and last night’s QT audience included supporters of different political parties, including the SNP.
The Canary asked the BBC to comment on the 16 January edition but it declined.
A Tory win all round
Femi Oluwole urged the BBC to be “simpler” in its explanation of audience selection, and raised a comparison from late last year:
WHAT THE F*** @bbcquestiontime
Just say you're a Tory Propaganda Machine. It's simpler.You hold a Under-30s Question Time and you make it 50-50 even though Under-30s are 70% Remain.
You hold a Question Time in England and you fill it with Tories.
Tories win both times! #BBCqt pic.twitter.com/X8Dk1tuxM8— Femi (@Femi_Sorry) January 16, 2020
The Under 30s edition of Question Time Oluwole mentioned, however, took place during an election. During such periods, “particular guidelines” apply to ensure balance. Nonetheless, his point that the ‘Tories won’ in terms of audience representation “both times” is spot on.
Others raised the fact that the BBC‘s choice of audience did not reflect the true ‘political picture’ in Liverpool at all:
The fact that the majority are Tories despite Liverpool having voted 76% Labour is shocking – if you don’t have Labour represented well in a massively Labour area, where will they be represented?
— Yindee8191 (@yindee8191) January 16, 2020
Well it certainly didn't reflect how Liverpool is. We are a Labour city and also, where the hell were the scousers on QT. Probably had others drafted in as you can't find a tory here. But definitely not a true reflection of Liverpool so what is the actual point visiting cities.
— Rho. 🌹 (@greekalphabet) January 17, 2020
Running scared?
The Conservative government showed little respect to the BBC during the election itself. Meanwhile, the BBC has also shown little respect to Labour or the left over the last few years.
As such, it’s hard not to suspect the broadcaster is running scared of the Tory Party. After all, Boris Johnson threated the broadcaster’s funding model just days after the election. Moreover, the BBC already faced regular accusations of Tory-bias in its audience selection. This change serves to allow that imbalance to continue, on the grounds that it’s Britain’s new reality.
But it is a change. This isn’t business ‘as usual’ for audience selection, despite what the broadcaster would have us believe.
Featured image via the BBC
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?
Support us -
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.
Defining ‘fair’ audience selection for panel shows drawing upon questions from the live audience and/or viewers is nigh impossible. Perhaps the grossly biassed can be identified, but nothing more.
The reputation of the BBC has plummeted over just a few years so far as anybody Left of Centre is concerned – or come to that anybody Centre – because of the bias. It’s particularly evident in the talking heads invited into the political news programmes on R4 and TV. They are invariably stuffed with Rightwing pundits while the narrative is pure Daily Mail. Newsnight is the worst. Partly one suspects it’s simply that most media types are now like Tory MP’s, public school and Oxbridge. It’s the same with journalists; once they were working class Grammar School boys who could be arsed to learn shorthand. But it’s also institutional bias to try and prevent the expected attack from this exceptionally Rightwing administration which will see the Licence done away with and the organisation left to survive as best it can. The printed media is out of control – self control I mean. Just look at the stories about the Royals!! That media is firmly in the hands of less than half a dozen billionaires who share one thing in common, a hatred of the Left. 2019 made it only too clear that a political movement that these handful of people don’t like is doomed to failure. That has serious implications as to how these threats can be dealt with.
BBC – Boris’ Broadcasting Corporation?
BBC – Biased Broadcasting Corporation?
BBC – Blatantly Biased for Conservatives?
It’s not the reputable company it once was. Well, perhaps it’s just not hiding it’s governmental role as well as it once did. Once I trusted the BBC. Silly me.
Ditto
This young man beat the BBC QT gate-keepers by posing as a Tory and then giving them both barrels:
https://skwawkbox.org/2020/01/24/video-man-poses-as-tory-to-get-onto-bbcqt-then-hammers-media-for-dividing-communities-to-help-tories-rule/
And re the BBC, JVL has this on their site; deserves our support re: forcing Ofcom to make BBC accountable for bias:
https://www.jewishvoiceforlabour.org.uk/article/challenge-bbc-bias/