The outrageous new audience selection policy BBC Question Time revealed last night

The BBC Question Time audience and host Fiona Bruce
Tracy Keeling


BBC Question Time revealed an outrageous new policy for audience selection on 16 January.

Apparently, following the Conservative Party gaining a substantial majority at the 2019 general election, the BBC will no longer select audiences to “reflect a broad range of political views”. Instead, the broadcaster is now choosing audience members based on “the current political picture” in the country where the episode takes place. On 16 January, that ensured Liverpool – an area of England where voters delivered only Labour MPs at the election – was represented by an audience of “more Conservative than Labour supporters”.

Worse still, host Fiona Bruce tried to pass it off as the BBC‘s standard practice.

As usual?

After introducing the programme’s panellists, Bruce said:

As usual, our audience has been selected to reflect the current political picture, depending where we are. So here in England that means there are more Conservative than Labour supporters plus a smaller number from other parties.

But there’s nothing “usual” about this selection process. The BBC‘s own web page on frequently asked questions says:

Question Time selects local audiences which reflect a broad range of political views. … This is to ensure a range of views are represented in the audience. …

Related articles

As with the make-up of the panels, Question Time is aiming to achieve due impartiality in the membership of the audience across the series as a whole, rather than being confined to an exact mathematical formula for each programme.

The standard line

Indeed, the BBC has faced criticism in the past for its audience make-up. In May 2019, SNP deputy leader Keith Brown accused the broadcaster of doing an episode in Scotland that was “stuffed full of Tory plants”.

In response to the 2019 criticism, the BBC stuck to its actual “usual” line in this instance, rather than the new one Bruce alleged was standard, saying:

There is a selection process to ensure a range of views are heard and last night’s QT audience included supporters of different political parties, including the SNP.

The Canary asked the BBC to comment on the 16 January edition but it declined.

A Tory win all round

Femi Oluwole urged the BBC to be “simpler” in its explanation of audience selection, and raised a comparison from late last year:

The Under 30s edition of Question Time Oluwole mentioned, however, took place during an election. During such periods, “particular guidelines” apply to ensure balance. Nonetheless, his point that the ‘Tories won’ in terms of audience representation “both times” is spot on.

Others raised the fact that the BBC‘s choice of audience did not reflect the true ‘political picture’ in Liverpool at all:

Running scared?

The Conservative government showed little respect to the BBC during the election itself. Meanwhile, the BBC has also shown little respect to Labour or the left over the last few years.

As such, it’s hard not to suspect the broadcaster is running scared of the Tory Party. After all, Boris Johnson threated the broadcaster’s funding model just days after the election. Moreover, the BBC already faced regular accusations of Tory-bias in its audience selection. This change serves to allow that imbalance to continue, on the grounds that it’s Britain’s new reality.

But it is a change. This isn’t business ‘as usual’ for audience selection, despite what the broadcaster would have us believe.

Featured image via the BBC

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us

Related articles