On 1 June, the BBC shared a video of swimmers enjoying London’s new ‘Sky Pool’, which is “believed to be the world’s first transparent pool built between two skyscrapers”. People soon took to Twitter to highlight the entrenched inequalities that the opulent architectural feature represents. Indeed, it’s situated at the heart of a city in which an estimated 170,068 people are homeless and over 600,000 children live in poverty.
London’s widening class divide
The Sky Pool is situated in Embassy Gardens, a housing development near the new US Embassy. The development is part of the £3bn Nine Elms regeneration zone, a riverside development which covers large areas of land from Vauxhall to Battersea in the south-west London boroughs of Lambeth and Wandsworth. Highlighting the inequality that persists in what has been dubbed an “opportunity area”, Labour councillor Maurice McIeod tweeted:
This is in my ward…in which more than half of children officially live in poverty. Just saying. https://t.co/RQGVwBu9mt
— Maurice Mcleod (he/him) (@mowords) June 1, 2021
Sharing the realities of life in the area for most residents, Jason Okundaye said:
This is 5 minutes away from the estate I grew up on in Battersea where the council abandons social housing tenants with damp, silverfish and no central heating in their flats for months but rubber stamps luxury developments like this on our doorstep https://t.co/ZyYCtRWAZR
— Jason Okundaye (@jasebyjason) June 1, 2021
Deploring the Tories’ prioritisation of private developments over social housing in the face of an entrenched housing crisis, Labour councillor Aydin Dikerdem said:
That’s why what’s happened here is so upsetting. We’re never again going to have all this abandoned industrial space which could’ve transformed the lives of people in a borough where thousands are statutorily homeless or spending half their income on private rent.
— Aydin Dikerdem (@AydinDikerdem) June 1, 2021
Segregating the residents
In February, journalist Oliver Wainright highlighted the fact that shared-ownership residents living in Embassy Gardens aren’t allowed access to the Sky Pool, the front door, or other features in the building. They must use “poor doors”, while private owners make the most of the amenities:
A reminder that the affordable housing residents of this development, whose windows look straight on to the pool, are not allowed to access it https://t.co/qgjWCJ8byB
— Olly Wainwright (@ollywainwright) June 1, 2021
In a thread setting out the inequalities inherent in the housing market, Nick Perry said:
I see responses to the silly “sky pool” has triggered developers’ apologists and their defence of so-called “poor doors”.
“The expensive flats cost more and that extra pays for the affordable housing.” Except it often doesn’t. Yet unfailingly inflates the housing market.
— Nick Perry (@realnickperry) June 2, 2021
Others, meanwhile, questioned the BBC‘s tone:
Upbeat @BBCNews puff piece about the ‘sky pool’ that fails to mention how residents with shared ownership are locked out of access. The Beeb cannot comprehend this as ‘political’ editorialising but it’s precisely that: whitewashed inequality presented as a neutral, fun story. https://t.co/w5h46bvnbc
— Chris Thorpe-Tracey ⧖ (@christt) June 1, 2021
Adding that “affordable” apartments in Embassy Gardens come with staggering £750k price tags, Dr Eleanor Janega stated:
Fun fact: residents in the "affordable" flats in these blocks are not allowed to use the Sky Pool, even if they pay. They just have to watch the rich people from their windows. Also the "affordable" flats still cost about 750k. https://t.co/5p0spku8lG
— Dr Eleanor Janega (@GoingMedieval) June 1, 2021
Britain’s cladding scandal
14 June will mark the 4th anniversary of the Grenfell Tower tragedy, which killed 72 residents. On 7 May, petrified residents called firefighters to New Providence Wharf, a tower block covered in “Grenfell-style” cladding. Although the cladding was not found to be a “significant factor” in this case, the London Fire Brigade found numerous failings in the building that should have been addressed by the building’s owner.
According to Anoosh Chakelian, the Sky Pool’s developer Ballymore is also responsible for New Providence Wharf, but made residents wait nearly four years to have the flammable cladding removed. Olympic Park Homes Action reflected on this injustice:
That the same developer can invest in a pool deemed architecturally fanciful on one side of London & fail for nearly 4 years to remove flammable cladding from a building on the other is a bleak story of our warped housing system. #BuildingSafetyCrisis https://t.co/I3FvzFcyR4
— Olympic Park Homes Action Group (@OlympicHomes_AG) June 3, 2021
Nathaniel Baker added:
So to confirm: Ballymore built an all-glass swimming pool suspended 115 foot in the sky, but said the reason it took four years to even begin removing Grenfell-style cladding from New Providence Wharf is because the work is "extremely complicated". https://t.co/vRBxt9tltD
— Nathaniel Barker (@NatBarkerIH) June 2, 2021
Another Twitter user simply said:
Sky pools for the rich, flammable cladding for the poor https://t.co/W5rpgCHt7j
— marxist-wet eggsist 🇵🇸 (@kronstadt2kool) June 2, 2021
London’s Sky Pool serves as a stark reminder of everything that’s wrong with Britain’s unjust housing system.
Featured image via @BBCNews/Twitter
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?