More lies and distraction from Boris Johnson with his latest comments on coal

Boris Johnson beside a climate crisis campaign poster
Support us and go ad-free

As reported by The Canary, Boris Jonson’s shameful comments about coal pit closures in the 1980s have outraged people. Johnson has also refused to apologise for those comments.

But given the deep hurt Thatcher caused by closing the pits in the 1908s, and the undercover police tactics used to target union members, it’s hard to believe a UK prime minister wouldn’t be aware of how inflammatory such a comment would be. Not to mention the fact that Thatcher did nothing to deliver quality jobs for those miners after the pits closed.

Additionally, it’s hard to believe a prime minister could claim the UK is moving “away from coal” – especially when the UK has continued to import coal. According to Tory Fibs on Twitter:

And while the transition away from coal hasn’t come quickly enough, it has come at the expense of workers and their communities.

Johnson’s nonsense coal claims

Government figures show that while consumption of domestically-mined coal fell, consumption of imported coal increased. And this was long after the Thatcher years. So while Thatcher closed coal pits and devastated communities, she didn’t end the UK’s dependency on coal:

Furthermore, data shows that while “coal has become less used as a fuel for electricity generation”, the UK still imported 6.5m metric tonnes of coal in 2019.

It’s sadly too familiar

But nonsensical claims from Johnson are sadly something we’ve become accustomed to, and not just on the environment. And as pointed out by Labour MP Dawn Butler, some of his claims are just outright lies. As a result, Butler wants parliament to change so MPs can call Johnson out on his lies. Moreover, lawyer and film-maker Peter Stefanovic has been relentless in exposing Johnson’s dishonesty.

Stefanovic’s video on Johnson’s “rampant lying in Parliament” now has over 30 million views. At the start of that video, he exposes Johnson on the environment. Johnson claims successive Tory governments since 2010 cut CO2 emissions (since 1990) by 42%. This is untrue according to Stefanovic. The real figure is a reduction in CO2 emissions by 39% between 1990 and 2018:

Meanwhile independent fact-checking site Full Fact couldn’t confirm if Johnson’s statements were ‘lies’. However, it did note that he hadn’t corrected any of those errors.

Because it’s hard to believe Johnson could be unaware of the impact of his outbursts, it leaves you thinking that these outbursts might be calculated:

COP 26 and the Tories’ environmental position

The UN climate change conference (COP 26) takes place in Glasgow in November 2021. So Johnson’s apparent understanding of the UK’s reliance on fossil fuels is, to say the very least, worrying. Assuming of course he’s not lying.

In reality, the Tories seem to have a jittery relationship with coal. Communities secretary Robert Jenrick’s change of position on the extraction of coking coal in Cumbria highlighted this. Initially, Jenrick didn’t want to intervene in Cumbria County Council’s decision to proceed with a coking coal mine. But then, two months later, he announced a public inquiry into the plans.

Furthermore, as extensively outlined in articles by The Canary‘s environment writer Tracy Keeling, the UK is failing its wildlife and is in denial about the climate crisis.

Johnson’s lying?

Any prime minister’s lack of awareness of, or insensitivity to, the devastation coal pit closures caused in the 1980s makes them unfit for office. So too does a weak position on the environment and a questionable relationship with the truth. And incessant as that relationship is, it must never stop us calling it out and calling for radical change.

Featured image via Wikimedia Commons – EU2017EE Estonian Presidency & Unsplash – Ma Ti

Support us and go ad-free

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. The closing of the mines was to destroy the National Union of Mineworkers and associated trade unions, such as those in transport. The unions were forcing governments to redistribute power and wealth more widely in the community. So, the clique which has always run Westminster and the state, decided to destroy them. Mr Nicholas Winterton’s memoirs make this clear. This war – and it was a civil war – against the miners, coupled with anti-TU laws and privatisations, were to disempower the majority of us and give it to the financial and landowning clique. Brexit was part of this strategy.

      Johnson is behaving with triumphalist contempt to the general public.

      1. Beautifully put, thank you.
        Now we await the thousands of annual deaths from cold and malnutrition from those Pensioners who gave their whole working lives to keep the home fires burning.
        Johnson turns my stomach every time he opens his privileged mouth.

    2. You forgot to mention that Harold Wilson closed the vast majority of the mines.
      In light of what we supposedly know about climate change now, are you seriously suggesting they should have stayed open? Until the left can stop acting like rebellious student activists, they’re destined to stay irrelevant, impotent and out of power.

    3. Thatcher’s attack on the mining industry was as unjustified as it was mistaken; the miners did not bring the Heath giovernment down, it brought itself down. The country voted against the Tories, disgusted by the non-stop series of exposures of moral and financial corruption of the Tory Party; remember the Poulson, Maudling (The Real Estate Fund of America), Birmingham, Slater Walker and Lonrho financial scandals, and the Norma Levy, Lord Lambton, Lord Lucan moral scandals; the 1970-74 Tory government made the government of Macmillan (of Profumo, John Vassall and John Bloom notoriety) look like a model of probity by comparison!

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.