The DWP just faced a protest outside the High Court

People outside the DWP court case
Support us and go ad-free

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) was in court on Wednesday 17 November. It was over its failure to support chronically ill and disabled claimants during the coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic. But campaign groups ensured that the case against the DWP did not go unnoticed.

DWP: ‘ignoring legacy benefit claimants’

During the pandemic, the DWP increased Universal Credit by £20-a-week. But it did not do the same for people on so-called legacy benefits. This included social security like Employment and Support Allowance (ESA). Disability rights activist Paula Peters previously told The Canary:

the Tories completely overlooked and ignored legacy benefit claimants during the pandemic. Many of these 2.2 million claimants are disabled people. Some were also shielding. Living costs rose and disabled people couldn’t afford the most basic standard of living…

We just want to live with dignity and respect.

But the DWP wasn’t going to get away with this that easily.

A court case, delayed

As The Canary previously reported, two disabled people are using legal aid to mount a judicial review. This is over the DWP’s failure to uplift legacy benefits in line with Universal Credit and Working Tax Credits. Firm Osbornes Law is representing them, and it’s looking at the government’s decision not to give an uplift to ESA. The case will argue that this is discrimination under the European Convention on Human Rights, because the claimants are disabled people.

So far, things have gone far from smoothly. Because of a shortage of judges and a backlog of cases, the High Court pushed the claimants’ judicial review hearing back from the end of September to 17 and 18 November. Then, at the last minute, the court changed the date of the second day to 19 November.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

The case is important, because it could affect millions of claimants. As the Mirror reported, people could be entitled to up to £1,500 in payments if the DWP loses the case. So, campaign groups and politicians were outside the High Court on 17 November in solidarity with everyone affected.

A High Court vigil

Groups like Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC) and Unite Community attended:

Charities like the MS Society were also there:

Labour MPs John McDonnell, Debbie Abrahams, Marsha de Cordova and SNP MPs Marion Fellows and David Linden were also present:

It’s unlikely the outcome of the case will be known by 19 November. But either way, the strength of feeling among some campaign groups and MPs is clear. The DWP would do well to listen.

If you have a case relating to social security or housing, Osbornes Law may be able to help. Find out more here

Featured image via Paula Peters 

Support us and go ad-free

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. An independent enquiry panel should be set up to reach out to former dwp workers who were (In 2017) offered £65 for every PIP claim refused (some even left their jobs through disgust at this). Yes it is true and I know because my relative who worked for the dwp at the time and is no liar told me as much. People have died because of this and it should at the very least least be investigated.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.