It has been revealed that benefit sanctions (that is, the removal of state financial support) against people with mental health issues has risen 700% under the Conservative government. This startling figure prompts us to take a hard look at how austerity has contributed to the deaths of British people.
From the moment the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition came into power in 2010, the welfare state and those dependent upon it came under threat. The coalition government demanded that every single person claiming social security payments for sickness or disability undergo a work capability test with Atos, to determine whether they could really be working. The clear implication being – many of these people are just trying it on. In fact, ministers not only implied it, but propagandised about it until many people believed it was benefit fraud, and not the Bank Bailout which caused our sky high debt.
The made-up figures made it into press releases, which resulted in bogus articles in the Telegraph, The Mail, The Sun, the Express, together with the ITV and BBC News (along with many local news outlets)– all of which parroted disinformation without bothering to verify it.
As a result, the lies repeated often enough became the truth and a climate of suspicion formed around those who find themselves reliant on the welfare system. This public stigmatisation, coupled with the threats and real cuts to vital financial support has resulted in sickness, suicide and death for those affected.
The government’s own statistics show that between 2010 and 2011 10,600 sick and disabled people died within six weeks of their ‘fit to work’ assessment by Atos and the DWP. This is 204 people a week, or 29 people a day, dying of the illnesses and conditions that the government has asked them to prove. These people spent their final weeks alive being harassed by the Job Centre, late payment notices and threats of eviction as their social safety net was ripped away.
What’s worse, is that more than 1,000 of those people had actually been deemed ‘fit to work’, and their benefits stopped as a result. As Another Angry Voice wrote at the time (in a report that we encourage you to read in full):
This figure stands at 1,300 for the 11 month period January 2011 to November 2011. From this we can extrapolate a reasonable estimate for the number of people to have died after being told that they are fit enough to prepare to return to the workplace. If we increase the figure by one 11th to extend it to cover a full year, we get 1,418 and extend it again by 15% to reflect the fact that the number of WCA assessments undertaken in 2012 has been significantly higher than those conducted in 2011, we get an estimated figure of 1,630 people to have died in 2012 within six weeks of having been told that they must start preparing to go back to work.
As this horrific figure is almost too large to take in, here are some names among that number.
Linda Wootton, 49, was on 10 medications a day after a double lung and heart transplant. She was weak and suffered regular blackouts. She was nevertheless put through the Atos Work Capability Assessment, and as she lay in a hospital bed dying, she received confirmation she was ‘fit to work’. She died just nine days later. Her husband Peter said:
I sat there and listened to my wife drown in her own bodily fluids. It took half an hour for her to die; a woman who is apparently fit for work.
Brian McArdle, 57, had been left paralysed down one side, blind in one eye, unable to speak properly and barely able to eat and dress himself after a stroke on Boxing Day 2011. Despite this, he was deemed ‘fit to work’ by Atos. He died of a heart attack the day after his benefit payments were stopped. His 13-year-old son Kieran told the Daily Record:
Even though my dad had another stroke just days before his assessment, he was determined to go…He tried his best to walk and talk because he was a very proud man, but even an idiot could have seen my dad wasn’t fit for work.
Colin Traynor, 29, suffered from epilepsy. He was deemed ‘fit for work’ by the DWP after an Atos assessment and forced to enter a lengthy, bureaucratic process to appeal the decision – during which his benefits were frozen. He did not live to see the result of his appeal. Five weeks after his death, his family received the news that his appeal was successful. Too late for Colin. His father Ray said:
I firmly believe – 100% believe – that the system this government introduced has killed my son.
The decision to place sick and disabled people under this level of wanton pain and disruption was as callous as it was ineffective.
A recent report, by researchers at Oxford and Liverpool universities, has directly linked austerity policies to mental health crises and suicide.
The report found that stress caused by enduring the Atos Work Capability Assessment (WCA) process was a contributing factor in 590 suicides and 279,000 cases of mental illness. It was also linked to an additional 725,000 antidepressants that were prescribed. Experts warned that the WCA may have “serious consequences” if people are moved off benefits. They went on to say:
Although the explicit aim of welfare reform in the UK is to reduce ‘dependency’, it is likely that targeting the people living in the most vulnerable conditions with policies that are harmful to health, will further marginalise already excluded groups, reducing, rather than increasing, their independence.
The Canary was criticised by some for a previous decision to break with Samaritans’ guidelines in order to report these findings and the individual suicide of a junior doctor. But this criticism overlooked something very important: context.
Firstly, all nuance was removed. For instance, our report stated:
Mental health and wellness is complex, and people rarely commit suicide or suffer mental health crises over one event or issue alone. As the Samaritans state:
However, what must be acknowledged is that Jeremy Hunt is providing the kind of stresses on junior doctors which can foster and exacerbate mental health crisis. Stresses like long working hours, lack of sleep, the financial concerns associated with reduced pay and conditions, and the creation of a hostile working environment.
Secondly, the point was validated by findings of the study by Oxford University and Liverpool University.
Thirdly, it was a decision we weighed with real care. The Samaritans is an esteemed organisation, and they wrote those guidelines with good reason. We also believed then, and we believe now, that the issue of government policies contributing to mental health crises and suicides has to be reported. It is also necessary that the plights of individuals should be made real, and their lives not reduced to a statistic.
We didn’t make these suicides political – they are political. Austerity, the work capability assessments, the terminal decline of working conditions and morale of NHS staff – these are political choices, with real world consequences. To fail to shine a light on that level of suffering, and demand change, is an abdication of responsibility in our view.
We are now at the stage where for the last two years, around a million British people have been relying on Food Banks to eat. We are a country where homeless men like Daniel Gauntlett are freezing to death on porches, and others like Ranjit Singh are being crushed to death by refuse collection vehicles after sheltering from the cold in bins. Our country has become a place where 590 people killed themselves in the last few years, in part, due to stresses placed on them by their own government; a place where nearly three-quarters of a million people require anti-depressants to help them cope with the same stresses. Forget writing about it, we should be shouting it from the rooftops. Thankfully many have.
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
We, and our partners, set cookies and collect information from your browser to provide you with website content, deliver relevant advertising and understand web audiences. See our privacy policy to learn more about how we manage your data and your rights. See our cookie consent policy to understand how we use cookies and tracking technology. To agree to our use of cookies, click "Accept".
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.