While everyone focuses on the Queen’s speech, the Conservative electoral fraud scandal continues to grow. Fresh, hard evidence has surfaced which vindicates claims that the Conservatives broke election spending limits with their battle bus campaign.
What had formerly only been found in online commentary and analysis, is now available in a physical copy. Blog posts can be changed or removed – but printed material cannot.
A senior political correspondent at The Telegraph wrote a book entitled Why the Tories Won: The Inside Story of the 2015 Election. The book confirms that the buses were used specifically to campaign in marginal seats:
The buses were critical to moving party troops from where they lived to where the swing voters could be found. The central party paid for all the buses and trains, as well as hotels and hostels.
This is totally at odds with the Conservative party’s position that the costs of the bus are national spending.
The Electoral Commission has clear guidelines on electoral spending limits:
There are two types of spending by or on behalf of parties at elections. These are:
Read on...Support us and go ad-free
Party campaign spending on campaigning to promote the party and its policies generally. For example, national newspaper adverts for the party, or leaflets explaining party policy. It also includes spending on promoting candidates at elections where the party nominates a list of candidates for a region, instead of individual candidates for local areas.
Candidate spending on campaigning to promote a particular candidate or candidates in their local area. For example, leaflets or websites that focus on one or more candidates and their views.
Different rules apply to the two types of spending.
In some cases, if the battle bus costs had been declared as candidate spending, it would’ve pushed the candidate over the spending limit.
The Conservatives claim the battle bus is national, not candidate spending. However, as the book tells, the battle bus was being used to deploy activists in specific, marginal constituencies.
The book also raises another problem for the Conservatives. It states:
During the short campaign, the Tories deployed one train of fifty people and five buses – two in the North-West, one in the Midlands, another in the South-West, and a Special Advisor’s bus leaving CCHQ – every day.
Meanwhile, the Code of Conduct for Special Advisors reads:
If a special adviser wishes to take part in an election or by-election campaign, he/she is able to do so in their own time and out of office hours. They may not use annual or unpaid leave for this purpose.
With the agreement of the Prime Minister, special advisers can remain in post during the General Election campaign period. Those who remain in post to work on government business must ensure that they do not use official resources for party political purposes and that any participation in the campaign is in a special adviser’s own time and outside office hours.
Considering the Special Advisor’s bus was leaving CCHQ “every day”, it is hard to see how they were campaigning “in their own time”.
The growing scandal
As The Canary‘s Bex Sumner previously summarised:
Dozens of Tory MPs face accusations that they illegally overspent in the 2015 general election campaign by failing to declare costs associated with the Conservative campaign “battle buses”. If the allegations are true, the MPs and their agents could face a year in jail and/or an unlimited fine, as well as a three-year ban on holding elected office – potentially triggering by-elections across the country and losing the Conservatives their majority in parliament.
Cheshire police, Derbyshire police, Devon and Cornwall police, Gloucestershire police, Greater Manchester police, Northamptonshire police, Staffordshire police, Warwickshire police, West Yorkshire police, Somerset police, Lincolnshire police, West Mercia police, West Midlands police and Nottinghamshire police are the forces undertaking criminal investigations so far.
Not only are the police undertaking investigations, but letters sent in the Prime Minister’s name may also constitute electoral fraud. In other words, Cameron himself may have broken the law to win swing seats in the 2015 general election.
The fresh, hard evidence contained within this book is going to be a thorn in Cameron’s backside. It will be hard for the Conservative party to sidestep this.
– If you live in one of at least 24 seats where Tory candidates may have been helped to victory without correctly claiming their expenses, please consider contacting your local police force to make a complaint about your candidate’s spending declaration – and to remind the police that they can apply to the courts for an extension to investigate the allegations.
Do your bit for independent journalism
Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.
We need you to help out, if you can.
When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.
You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.
In return you get:
- Advert free reading experience
- Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
- 20% discount from our shop