George Osborne’s legacy has hit an all-time low as he falls behind on his own deficit-reduction programme just a month into the new financial year. The Chancellor is already £600m behind his own target.
But this is no anomaly. Austerity is repeatedly failing to pay down public debt because it is a con.
The true aim of austerity
Having already missed two of his own targets, Osborne continues to mishandle public finances. It’s clear that he serves profit over people, concerned not with Britain’s finances but with the fire-sale of our assets to private interest.
Osborne is not an economist. He’s a fraudster.
Economists draw up balance sheets for financial entities with two categories: assets and liabilities. Assets are what make the institution money, and liabilities are the money it owes. Liquidity, meanwhile, is the ability of the financial institution to make payments on time. A financial institution can have many assets but lack liquidity because it does not have funds ready to make payments. If this is the case, the financial institution is forced to sell off its assets quickly, often at a loss.
Money that is not invested in assets is considered wasteful, as the money could be turning a profit.
When we founded the NHS and built over a million new homes – 80% of which were social housing – under Clement Attlee’s post-war government, public debt was at 225% of GDP. It is currently at 80% of GDP, thus proving that we do not have a liquidity restraint because of the financial crisis. But this is the Conservative narrative – that we must make cutbacks and sell off our assets because our finances are restrained.
If Osborne was an economist, he would look at public finances in this way, and wouldn’t sell off our assets on the cheap with no liquidity stranglehold.
But he’s not an economist. He’s a con man. And by setting arbitrary dates for deficit reduction, he has concocted liquidity restraints in order to justify selling off our assets on the cheap to his mates.
A Treasury spokesman previously said:
Central to our plan to fix the public finances is the sale of government assets to help pay down the national debt and ensure economic security for working people
That’s why we’ve set an ambitious target to sell £5bn worth of assets by 2020, which will put us on track to meet our target.
Arbitrary targets give the illusion of progress, while justifying the sale of assets. Why would wealthy business owners want to buy them if they were not profitable in the long run?
In 2015 alone, Osborne privatised the following, often at a loss:
- Greencoat UK Wind.
- Our entire 40% stake in the Eurostar.
- Our remaining 30% stake in Royal Mail.
- 5.4% of our stake in the Royal Bank of Scotland.
- Northern Rock mortgage assets & Lloyds Tsb shares.
Despite reaping the short-term gains of privatisation, Osborne still manages to miss all of his own arbitrary deficit reduction targets. And in the long-term it’ll be even worse. Take the planned privatisation of our land registry – millions yearly in long-term profit sacrificed for a short-term boost.
Just a month into this financial year and Osborne is already failing in his plan for Britain’s finances, borrowing £600m more than the £6.6bn predicted.
Embarrassingly, the Chancellor has immediately fallen flat on his face as his legacy plummets even further into ruin. Let’s now steer away from austerity and towards an automated and resource-based economy.
– The People’s Assembly Against Austerity has a search function that makes finding local groups easy.
– Support The Canary, so we can go on telling it like it is.
– Write to your MP to tell them what you think about government policies.
Featured image via Foreign and Commonwealth Office/Flickr.
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?