When Angela Eagle, Shadow First Secretary of State and Shadow Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, and Skills handed in her resignation letter to Jeremy Corbyn, she made her misgivings with his leadership clear.
In particular, she cited his performance in the Remain campaign as a reason why she had lost faith in him. Unfortunately for Eagle, just two weeks ago, she was singing a very different tune.
Speaking to The Guardian, and quoted in their EU referendum live blog at 16:41 on 13 June, Eagle said of Corbyn:
Jeremy is up and down the country, pursuing an itinerary that would make a 25-year-old tired, he has not stopped.
Eagle describes the Labour leader as working hard – tirelessly, even. However, fast-forward to her resignation on 27 June, and she tells a different story.
I was devastated by the result of the EU referendum. Too many of our supporters were taken in by right-wing arguments and I believe this happened, in part, because under your leadership the case to remain in the EU was made with half-hearted ambivalence rather than full-throated clarity.
In her interview with The Guardian, Eagle had no issue recognising the ways that David Cameron and other Conservative Remainers hampered the campaign by making discussions inevitably focus on what Eagle calls “blue on blue psychodrama”, in reference to the split amongst Tories on Brexit.
But such acknowledgement of the difficulties faced by the Remain campaign is missing from her resignation letter, and the words of many of the other MPs who have come out against Corbyn. When considering reports alleging that the coup was planned months in advance, this begins to appear more than a little convenient.
If Eagle does have designs on the party leadership, she may want to avoid publicly contradicting herself in future.
Sign the petition in support of Corbyn here.
Featured image via Wikimedia Commons.
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?