Jeremy Corbyn took to TV on 10 July to set the BBC straight on the leadership contest which he’s likely to face in the coming days. And in his first comprehensive interview since Labour MPs to his right launched a coup at the end of June, he was clearly on form.
On 9 July, Labour’s deputy leader Tom Watson backed out of union-brokered talks aimed at unifying the party. The leader of Britain’s biggest trade union, Len McCluskey, called this a “deeply disingenuous manoeuvre” and an “act of sabotage” at a point when a resolution to the Labour party’s parliamentary crisis had “never been closer”.
Angela Eagle is now poised to run against Corbyn for the post of Labour leader.
Speaking about this leadership challenge on the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show on 10 July, Corbyn remained calm and collected. But he was pushed to clarify the current procedures within the Labour party when Marr made an assumption that appeared to favour anti-Corbyn MPs – or at the very least echo their own rhetoric. The presenter asked:
Are you confident you can get the 51 nominations you need to be on the ballot for the next leadership [election]?
Corbyn has consistently asserted that he will be on the ballot if a leadership contest takes place, but Marr clearly hadn’t been taking much notice. The Labour leader seemed prepared for such misleading questions, though, and politely corrected the presenter:
I’m expecting to be on the ballot paper because the rules of the party indicate that the existing leader, if challenged, should be on the ballot paper anyway
Marr sought to defend himself, insisting:
But the legal advice that’s been taken by the party says that you do need those nominations, as Neil Kinnock had to get them when he was challenged
Corbyn again set Marr straight:
Neil should remind himself – that was in 1988, when the election of a leader was done by an electoral college system that has long since been abolished. We now have a ‘one member one vote’ system. The rules, in my view, are absolutely clear. And indeed, I’m not sure what this legal advice is you’re referring to. I have not been shown any legal advice to that effect.
The Labour leader also had a strong message for his parliamentary detractors to mull over:
The party is a coalition of affiliated unions, socialist societies, individual members, registered supporters, and members of parliament. They have to come together.
I have reached out in a way that no other leader ever has in the breadth of the political views of people I’ve brought round the shadow cabinet table. I’m not the one who’s been trying to box myself into a corner.
…It’s a democratic party, not a dictatorship. I was elected by a very large majority of members and supporters… I would respectfully suggest that a little bit of movement to help us develop policies and campaign against this government ought to be our priority at the moment.
In short, Corbyn’s not going anywhere. And while he’d prefer for Labour MPs to focus their efforts on opposing the Conservative government at this turbulent time for British politics, he’s clearly ready for a leadership contest if his parliamentary opponents demand one.
See the full interview here:
Former Channel 4 Economics Editor Paul Mason recently said, “the future, not just of the Labour party but of the country, will be decided on who runs Labour”.
For Canary readers who are current or potential Labour supporters, you can sign this petition to back Jeremy Corbyn (if you haven’t already).
Corbyn’s supporters at Momentum have also called on people to:
- Contact their MPs to express their support for the Labour leader.
- Thank their unions for continuing to back Corbyn.
- Express themselves on Facebook and Twitter using the hashtags #OurPartyOurLeader and #KeepCorbyn.
- Join its group and the Labour party to make their voices heard.
Featured image via BBC News/YouTube
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?