Theresa May just tried to bullsh*t her way out of protecting the NHS, but Jeremy Corbyn was having none of it [VIDEO]

Support us and go ad-free

During Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs) on 19 October, Theresa May refused to promise protection for A&E facilities in the NHS, and attempted to justify why. But she actually used an argument against ring-fencing those services which was identical to the one her party used for its transformation of the NHS as a whole. And Jeremy Corbyn didn’t let that hypocrisy go unnoticed.

NHS footprints

At PMQs, the Labour leader asked the Prime Minister about A&E services, saying:

Next month, Mr Speaker, Sustainability and Transformation Plans are going to be published. Many all over the country are quite alarmed by this because of the threat to accident and emergency departments.

Can the Prime Minister deal with this issue now, by quite simply saying there will be no downgrades and no closures of A&E departments in this statement coming out next month?

Corbyn referenced plans introduced by the Conservative government. Under the proposals, the NHS has been carved up into 44 regions, known as ‘footprints’. These ‘footprints’, or ‘networks’, have to create a ‘Five Year Forward View’ that sets out how they will bring themselves into financial balance by 2017.

‘Footprints’ that don’t succeed in creating financial balance will be cut off from access to money from other funding streams. So they have a serious incentive to do so. And it is the pressure to create this balance that could force A&E departments to close.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

No top-down orders, you say?

May avoided answering Corbyn’s question. But she claimed her party had put “a record level of investment” into the NHS. And she identified how the Tories’ approach to the NHS differed from Labour’s:

We believe on this side of the house that, at a local level, people should be able to make decisions about the National Health Service; that decisions about the National Health Service should be led by clinicians; that it shouldn’t be a top-down approach which is typical of the Labour Party.

To that statement, Corbyn responded:

Wow. Wow, Mr Speaker. Well, top down is what we got. And it cost £3bn for a reorganisation that nobody wanted at all.

The Labour leader’s reaction hit the nail on the head. Because the very reason the Sustainablity and Transformation Plans exist is due to the Tories’ top-down reorganisation of the NHS. In fact, since the Conservatives took the reins of government, there have been two top-down reorganisations of our health service. Firstly, through then Health Secretary Andrew Lansley’s 2012 Health and Social Care Act. And secondly, through these latest reforms.

Is the NHS safe in May’s hands?

Yet all this top-down reorganisation seems to have achieved is bringing the NHS to the brink of financial collapse; and fragmenting the service while private companies get rich off the pieces. The government has even managed to alienate the workers that keep the NHS afloat by forcing contracts onto junior doctors and stripping nurses of their bursaries.

And alongside the concern over competence, there is a trust issue. May’s response to Corbyn’s question illustrates her willingness to deceive the public. Clearly, the Tories do believe in top-down reorganisation, or they wouldn’t have done it themselves. But when faced with an opportunity to use it as a political football against Labour, she claimed her party believes the opposite.

Our NHS deserves better than that. And that’s surely something almost the entire country would agree on.

Get Involved!

Take action with Keep our NHS Public.

Read more Canary articles on the NHS.

Support The Canary if you appreciate the work we do.

Featured image via Tom Donnelly/YouTube

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed