As Labour gets fined over election expenses, the Tories’ election fraud scandal is being ignored

David Cameron facing Marr over Tory election fraud allegations
Support us and go ad-free

It was revealed on Tuesday 25 October that the Labour Party had been fined over undeclared election expenses. The Electoral Commission fined the party £20,000 for not submitting numerous expenses from the 2015 general election, including the infamous ‘Ed Stone’. But it begs the question — just what is happening with the so-called Tory election fraud scandal?

Hitting brick walls

The Commission found that the Labour Party had not declared £123,748 of expenses during last year’s election campaign. These included the 8ft stone tablet which had Labour’s key pledges carved into it – the missing costs being £7,614. A further 33 receipts were missing from the campaign, in addition to 49 for transport costs.

The party’s General Secretary, Iain McNicol, committed two offences under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act in relation to the missing payments and the missing invoices. The fine of £20,000 is the highest in the Electoral Commission’s history. And while the commission said Labour had co-operated throughout the inquiry, it criticised the party for not providing requested information in a “reasonable time frame”.

But while Labour has been held to account over what could be considered fraudulent expenses, the Conservative Party’s alleged election fraud appears to have been kicked into the long grass.

Unprecedented fraud?

As The Canary previously revealed, the Electoral Commission and police were investigating allegations that tens of thousands of pounds which should have been declared as expenses locally were in fact paid for nationally. These expenses fell into two main areas: the use of hotels for campaign staff, and the so-called Tory “Battle Bus” – which ferried activists up and down the country. If they should have been declared locally, this would mean that the Tories had breached spending limits in at least 29 constituencies. That, in turn, may well put the legitimacy of the 2015 general election result into question.

In June, 18 police forces across the UK had been given or were seeking an extension to the time limit for investigations related to election expenses. David Cameron’s Conservative government was the first government in British history to face police investigations into alleged electoral fraud.

One such example was in South Thanet, where Craig Mackinlay is the Conservative MP. The party is accused of spending around £20,000 on Mackinlay’s 2015 campaign which wasn’t just not declared as national or local spending, but was in fact not declared at all. In June, Mackinlay attempted in court to block a police investigation into the matter. But the judge threw the case out, saying that the alleged fraud was on an “unprecedented scale” and the police investigation was of “very significant public interest”.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Tory pork pies?

David Cameron, when he was still Prime Minister, went on the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show to defend Mackinlay’s court action. Marr asked:

Did you authorise the payment of a very expensive QC to go to Kent Police and try to stop them extending their investigation? Because this looks like a cover-up.

In an attempt to deflect from his own apparent involvement in the “cover-up”, Cameron said:

This is all being handled, I think quite properly, by the party Chairman, and I’m very happy that what we did was right and we can answer all the questions that we’re being [asked].

Since then, the investigations appear to have gone quiet. As The Guardian reported on 29 July, police forces are applying for a year’s investigation extension, but no conclusions have been drawn yet.

The judgement over the Labour Party’s transport costs now shines some light into the severity of the allegations about the Tories. The Electoral Commission said it didn’t suspect an offence had been committed regarding Labour busing activists up and down the country. The fact that the Commission has not yet dismissed the same allegations against the Conservatives could well mean there is a case to answer.

Get Involved!

– See other Canary articles on the electoral fraud scandal.

Support The Canary’s independent journalism.

Featured image via screengrab

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed