Theresa May’s plans for Brexit just received another blow. On 4 November, Conservative MP Stephen Phillips, who voted ‘Leave’ in the referendum, resigned due to “significant policy differences”.
The roots of the disagreement
The MP has criticised May in the past for opposing MPs who want to discuss events after Article 50 is triggered. At the Conservative Party Conference in October 2016, May said of MPs who want the discussion:
They’re not trying to get Brexit right. They’re trying to kill it by delaying it. They are insulting the intelligence of the British people.
At the time, Phillips responded:
I and many others did not exercise our vote in the referendum so as to restore the sovereignty of this parliament only to see what we regarded as the tyranny of the European Union replaced by that of a government that apparently wishes to ignore the views of the house on the most important issue facing the nation.
In an opinion piece for The Guardian, he wrote:
although the government may have a mandate for Brexit, it has no mandate at all for what it should look like.
The government’s response to the High Court ruling may have been the last straw for Phillips.
On 3 November, judges ruled that parliament would need to discuss the Brexit package before triggering Article 50. According to Liam Fox, Secretary of State for International Trade, the government was “disappointed” by the decision. It is now planning to appeal to the Supreme Court.
It has been suggested that Phillips, a barrister himself, may disapprove of this course of action.
Phillip's friends tell me the decision by No 10 to appeal a "clear cut" legal defeat on involving MPs in Brexit was the final factor yday
— Faisal Islam (@faisalislam) November 4, 2016
In his resignation letter, Phillips stated:
It has become clear to me over the last few months that my growing and very significant policy differences with the current government mean that I am unable properly to represent the people who elected me.
A Downing Street source suggested that Phillips is not acting as “part of a movement“. Whether this is true or not, his resignation will be a cause for concern for May and her government. If she can’t keep her own MPs on side, what hope is there for creating a Brexit strategy that will appease everyone else?
– Read the rest of The Canary’s Brexit coverage here.
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.