Theresa May’s plans for Brexit just received another blow. On 4 November, Conservative MP Stephen Phillips, who voted ‘Leave’ in the referendum, resigned due to “significant policy differences”.
The roots of the disagreement
The MP has criticised May in the past for opposing MPs who want to discuss events after Article 50 is triggered. At the Conservative Party Conference in October 2016, May said of MPs who want the discussion:
They’re not trying to get Brexit right. They’re trying to kill it by delaying it. They are insulting the intelligence of the British people.
At the time, Phillips responded:
I and many others did not exercise our vote in the referendum so as to restore the sovereignty of this parliament only to see what we regarded as the tyranny of the European Union replaced by that of a government that apparently wishes to ignore the views of the house on the most important issue facing the nation.
In an opinion piece for The Guardian, he wrote:
although the government may have a mandate for Brexit, it has no mandate at all for what it should look like.
Read on...Support us and go ad-free
The government’s response to the High Court ruling may have been the last straw for Phillips.
On 3 November, judges ruled that parliament would need to discuss the Brexit package before triggering Article 50. According to Liam Fox, Secretary of State for International Trade, the government was “disappointed” by the decision. It is now planning to appeal to the Supreme Court.
It has been suggested that Phillips, a barrister himself, may disapprove of this course of action.
Phillip's friends tell me the decision by No 10 to appeal a "clear cut" legal defeat on involving MPs in Brexit was the final factor yday
— Faisal Islam (@faisalislam) November 4, 2016
In his resignation letter, Phillips stated:
It has become clear to me over the last few months that my growing and very significant policy differences with the current government mean that I am unable properly to represent the people who elected me.
A Downing Street source suggested that Phillips is not acting as “part of a movement“. Whether this is true or not, his resignation will be a cause for concern for May and her government. If she can’t keep her own MPs on side, what hope is there for creating a Brexit strategy that will appease everyone else?
– Read the rest of The Canary’s Brexit coverage here.
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?