Theresa May brings in a dangerous new policy that could silence free speech [OPINION]

Support us and go ad-free

Theresa May has announced a new policy that could silence undesirable criticism, within a speech to the Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI).

The UK will be formally adopting the intergovernmental International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism:

Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.

But its definition goes above and beyond this common sense assertion. The organisation expands on the definition to include Israel. For Jewish activist Naomi Wimborne-Idrissi, the definition provides ample space for equating criticism of the State of Israel with antisemitism.

Being played

The Arab-Jewish Forum’s Tony Klug wrote in The Jewish Chronicle:

While antisemitism is monstrous – and, like all forms of racism, should be vigorously dealt with – false accusations of antisemitism are monstrous too. Not only are they damning, they diminish authentic occurrences, of which, sadly, there are still many.

The State of Israel and its UK allies in the Conservative and Labour parties are known to smear critics of Israeli governmental policy as antisemitic. Since Labour has been led by a staunch critic of the State of Israel, Jeremy Corbyn, an antisemitism crisis has been concocted within the party. In reality, the majority [pdf, p18] of politically-motivated antisemitic incidents come from the far right.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

The Prime Minister, unsurprisingly, got fully behind the smear campaign in her speech to the CFI:

it is disgusting that these twisted views are being found in British politics.

Of course, I am talking mainly about the Labour Party and their hard-left allies

The definition

The UK’s new official definition of antisemitism provides ample space for equating criticism of the State of Israel with antisemitism, according to Jewish activist Wimborne-Idrissi.

Within the definition, the following example is given:

Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.

Wimborne-Idrissi explains how this can be favourable to Israeli policies:

If this is anti-Semitic, then Jewish organizations that uphold loyalty to Israel – as most do – will be immune from criticism for doing so. Dissenting Jews, or anyone else who wonders aloud why the Board of Deputies of British Jews, which claims to represent all Jews in the country, persists in supporting Israel right or wrong, will be silenced.

Here is another example of antisemitism given within the UK’s new definition:

Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g. by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.

Wimborne-Idrissi points out that a lot of atrocities have been committed in the name of self-determination:

Asserting the right to self-determination does not give any group a right to suppress others in its name. Palestinians also have rights, including the right to protest at the injustices inflicted upon them in the name of Jewish self-determination. It is not anti-Semitic for them to do so, nor for anyone else to support them.

She also noted the origins of the State of Israel:

It was almost by definition a racist endeavor since the intention was to conquer and occupy the maximum amount of land while ensuring that the fewest possible non-Jewish inhabitants remained on it.

Palestinian rights?

Of course, holding Jewish people collectively responsible for the actions of the State of Israel is antisemitic and wrong, as asserted by the new definition.

But what about Palestinian rights? The human rights of Palestinians are violated daily, but the UK government seems only concerned with the rights of the perpetrator: the State of Israel. The definition specifies: “Antisemitic discrimination is the denial to Jews of opportunities or services available to others and is illegal in many countries”. Yet that’s precisely what the State of Israel is doing to Palestinians, often under the thinly-veiled guise of “cultural incompatibility”.

In a broader context, Islamophobia has risen and been almost normalised by politicians like Donald Trump. If the Prime Minister is concerned about prejudice, why the action on antisemitism only?

Well, when it comes to UK foreign policy, prejudice against Muslims is useful. It can help generate support for wars in the Middle East. But antisemitism is not useful, and criticism of the State of Israel is undesirable for UK foreign policy efforts. The UK is Israel’s second largest trading partner.

Antisemitism should always be condemned. But politically appropriating antisemitism to smear critics is wrong. It only diminishes the real incidents.

Get Involved!

– Visit our Facebook and Twitter pages for more of our international coverage at The Canary Global.

– Write to your political representatives if you support Palestinian rights, in the UK and US.

– Take action against Israeli settlements with the Boycott, Divestments and Sanctions (BDS) movement.

– Support the Palestinian Solidarity Campaign.

Featured image via Flickr

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed