Social media users have been sharing a video of Asda staff apparently banning a woman from its Rochdale branch. In it, they appear to bar her for defending a homeless woman. But there are two sides to this story.
On Tuesday 21 February, social media accounts began posting the video on Facebook.
In the video, the customer says the security guard’s treatment of the homeless woman was “absolutely disgusting”:
It was minus two outside. The girl didn’t have any shoes on her feet. It was absolutely freezing.
The Asda staff imply they are banning her because of the way she spoke to the security guard. But she accuses the security guard of “playing the racist card”. And she then goes on to say:
Shall we recap, then, how you spoke to that girl? ‘Get back to drunk land’?
She also says she was not racist to the security guard, and that she has footage of the alleged incident. But then she says of the security guard’s attitude to the homeless woman:
A man spoke to a woman like that. He might be able to get away with it in his culture, but he can’t get away with it in my culture.
The Canary contacted Asda for a response but none was received by the time of publication. The Canary was unable to contact the woman in the video.
We’re all victims
The security guard’s alleged treatment of the homeless woman was, if true, appalling. But the customer who tried to help her was little better. Assuming all homeless people are drunks, and assuming all men who might possibly be from a different culture are misogynistic, is merely playing into politicians’ divide and conquer tactics. We need to all start getting along. And quickly.
– Support homelessness campaign group Streets Kitchen.
Featured image via screengrab
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?