The Westminster journalist who picked a fight with Scotland… and lost [TWEETS]

Support us and go ad-free

A Westminster journalist claimed overnight that the Scottish campaign for independence is “probably the most unpleasant… after the Trump lot. Certainly worse than Brexit.” It was the start of a fight with Scotland that he would lose, fast.

Project Fear vs Scotland

In 2014, Scotland voted narrowly to remain in the United Kingdom, with 45% voting ‘Yes’ (to leaving). Even The Telegraph admitted that ‘Project Fear’ won the referendum. This refers to the strategy deployed by the media and political class opposed to independence. Namely, to blast voters with scaremongering stories until they voted ‘No’.

Two of the deciding factors in the referendum were Scotland’s place in the EU, and keeping the sterling currency. At the height of the campaign, then-Chancellor George Osborne told Scottish voters that they risked losing the pound if they left the union. And EU Commission President José Manuel Barroso claimed it would be “extremely difficult” for an independent Scotland to gain membership to the EU. These are both demonstrably false.

As Scotland moves towards a second referendum following the UK (predominantly England and Wales) voting to leave the EU, a new anti-independence campaign has begun. This time, the focus is on linking support for independence to racism.

Scottish nationalists are racists now?

Westminster worked hard to portray the Scottish independence movement as racist during the 2014 referendum. They went as far as to compare pro-independence voters to Nazis. The detail of this strategy was laid out expertly by Gerry Hassan for openDemocracy at the time.

And now, history is repeating itself. London Mayor Sadiq Khan gave an inflammatory speech last week in which he stated:

There’s no difference between those who try to divide us on the basis of whether we’re English or Scottish and those who try to divide us on the basis of our background, race or religion

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Of course, most people understand the difference between racist nationalist movements and independence movements.

People have also drawn comparison between India and Pakistan seeking independence:

This suggests that his statements were not based on a genuine concern over racism, but form part of a cynical game of politics. The goal being to generate enough fear to keep Scotland shackled to a UK which is heading for a hard Brexit.

Enter Ian Dunt

It was in this climate that Ian Dunt entered the fray. On the pretext of (entirely justified) outrage at the intimidation of a journalist who had backed Khan’s argument, Dunt swung for the independence movement as a whole.

Twitterati peer Hugo Rifkind pointed out some issues with The Guardian article, namely its provocative headline. Which Dunt accepted. But he continued to besmirch the movement anyway.

At this point, pro-independence site Wings Over Scotland intervened with a painfully astute reality check.

While Rifkind engaged with the question, Dunt retreated to the safety of sarcastic sub-tweets with his colleagues in Westminster.

Following a formula

This tired routine has been applied for years against not only the independence movement in Scotland, but also Corbyn’s Labour movement too. Westminster journalists stoop to the most base terms of abuse and, when a response comes, they claim it to be proof of their view. Like here:

Notice how Dunt turns a perfectly civil piece of critical feedback into proof positive that pro-independence campaigners are somehow ‘unpleasant’. It’s inherently ridiculous to everyone outside the Westminster bubble, but gospel to those within it. Which is why the Westminster parties have lost almost every seat in Scotland, and are likely to lose the next independence referendum. Because when anyone finds themselves in an abusive relationship, they should leave.

Get Involved!

Support the work of new media organisations below. Please add more that you like in the comments.

The CanaryMedia DiversifiedNovara MediaCorporate WatchCommon SpaceMedia LensAnother Angry VoiceBella CaledoniaVox PoliticalEvolve PoliticsReal Media, Red PepperReel News, ROARSTRIKE! magazineThe Bristol CableManchester MuleSalford Star

Featured image via YouTube Screengrab/Toxic Drums

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed