Now we know more about the attacker, the far-right opportunists should be ashamed [VIDEO]

Support us and go ad-free

In her statement to parliament, Theresa May said that the 22 March attacker was British and known to MI5 for some years. Yet the far right, including Nigel Farage, haveĀ been using the tragedy to advance an anti-immigrant, anti-refugee agenda. Before they knew any details about the attack.

On 22 March, an unnamed assailant drove a hired car into Westminster bridge, killing two people. Crashing the car outside parliament, he stabbed an unarmed police officer who later died from the injuries. Armed police then shot him.

Far right

On the night of the attack, Farage was commentating on Fox News. The former UKIP leader was rallying against immigration in response:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Farage also used the attack to justify Donald Trump’s second ban on people from six Muslim-majority countries entering the US:

But given that the perpetrator was British, immigration is irrelevant to the attack.

https://twitter.com/liamyoung/status/844867342077050880

Trump has also issued an indefinite ban on Syrian refugees. Even though no Syrian refugee has been charged with intent to carry out an attack in the US in more than four decades.

The Polish Prime Minister joined Nigel Farage in exploiting the attack to justify anti-foreigner policies. Beata Szydlo said:

I hear in Europe very often: do not connect the migration policy with terrorism, but it is impossible not to connect them

She said the attack vindicated the Polish far right government’s refusal to accept any refugees.

Millionaire UKIP bankroller Aaron Banks also sought to capitalise on the attacks before knowing basic information:

Many called for media outlets to stop platforming people who spread hate:

https://twitter.com/MutazElnour/status/844885876945702915

As well as high-profile UKIP figures, Katie Hopkins penned a column in The Daily Mail blaming immigrants:

This place is just like Sweden. Terrified of admitting the truth about the threat we face, about the horrors committed by the migrants we failed to deter.

There was similar hate directed at refugees after the November 2015 Paris attacks. Later, it turned out nearly all the attackers were Belgian or French.

Even if Hopkins and co were right and the attacker was from another country, it does not mean we should impose collective punishment on refugees and immigrants. Those who view MuslimĀ people and immigrants indiscriminately are reciprocating the same outlook as the attacker, who viewed the people he killed in London indiscriminately.

The attacker was British. That should communicate that violence has no nationality. Hate must be condemned wherever it comes from and wherever it is seen.

The Canary will be following developmentsĀ here.

Featured image via screenshot

Support us and go ad-free

Do your bit for independent journalism

Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of aĀ free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.

We need you to help out, if you can.

When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.

You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.

In return you get:

  • Advert free reading experience
  • Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
  • 20% discount from our shop

 

The Canary Fund us

Comments are closed