The Conservative government has used the Easter break as an excuse to deny disability benefits to 160,000 people. Controversial changes to Personal Independence Payments (PIP) were subject to an Emergency Debate on Wednesday 29 March. But due to parliament’s Easter break, there will be no time for a vote.
As The Canary previously reported, the government announced emergency legislation to deny 160,000 people access to Personal Independence Payments (PIP) on 24 February.
Two tribunal judgements found that the current criteria for claiming Personal Independence Payment (PIP) were insufficient. But the government doesn’t want to pay the extra cost. And so, in an attempt to save £3.7bn, it introduced emergency legislation to overrule the tribunal decision.
Instead of supporting disabled people, the benefits system seems increasingly rigged against them. The whole system needs urgent improvement, in order to accurately assess the support they need. Disabled people cannot afford to wait.
Even the government’s own welfare advisers criticised the changes. The Social Security Advisory Committee’s report into the changes found that:
The department should both (a) consult more widely with representative bodies and health care professionals; and (b) improve the estimate of likely impact before the changes are introduced.
Read on...Support us and go ad-free
And finally, the House of Lords spoke out about the decision. While a motion to defeat the changes was halted, the Lords did vote to “regret” the changes. But unfortunately, their “regret” will have no impact on the disabled people losing their benefits. It is simply a motion that criticises the government.
The changes were introduced via a ‘statutory instrument’. As The Canary previously reported, statutory instruments are a convenient way of bypassing parliament:
Statutory instruments allow ministers to fast-track changes to existing laws without the need for new acts of parliament. Introduced in the 1940s to free up parliamentary time, they were traditionally used for fairly limited purposes – like elaborating on complex technical details. But they’re extremely convenient for ministers: they (normally) can’t be amended, many of them are not scrutinised by parliament at all – and if they are, they can normally only be debated for a maximum of 90 minutes.
But while the government argued that this legislation needed to be brought in urgently due to the amount of money involved, Shadow Department of Work and Pensions Secretary Debbie Abrahams stated:
In a letter to me last week, the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions said that he became aware of the rulings on 8 December. Two and a half months later, the Government laid their emergency legislation before Parliament. I am sure that the irony of something taking two and a half months in an ’emergency’ has not been lost on you, Mr Speaker. During those two and a half months, not only were the Government unable to bring the regulations before the House, but they also bypassed their own Social Security Advisory Committee.
Not a joking matter
And with even their own MPs speaking out against the changes, the government knew that it was likely to lose if it came to a vote. DWP Secretary Damien Green joked that allowing a vote was:
above my paygrade.
But it’s far from a joke. And instead, it was left until the last day of parliament before Easter for the emergency debate. This means, under the terms of emergency legislation, that MPs will be out of time to demand a vote after the break. Abrahams described it as a:
troubling subversion of democracy
The nasty party
The nasty party is alive and kicking. A party that is prepared to screw over disabled people without parliamentary scrutiny. Many MPs spoke passionately at the emergency debate – describing what has happened to their own constituents.
But ultimately, it was in vain. Because there was no vote. And the changes are now law.
The government not only doesn’t care about disabled people, it treats them with contempt. Our so-called democracy has failed. And now it’s down to us to make sure that they don’t get away with it.
– Support Disabled People Against the Cuts.
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?