There’s a good reason we should have been talking about the Westminster attack again today. But the media ignored it

May Article 50
Tracy Keeling

Prime Minister Theresa May stands accused of trying to blackmail the EU. And media outlets have widely covered the story. But they have done the British public a great disservice. Because they’ve failed to acknowledge the scandal’s most uncomfortable detail.

Brexit bargaining chips

May sent the Article 50 letter, which marks the start of the UK’s official withdrawal from the EU, to European leaders on 29 March. In it, the Prime Minister said that the UK wants “a deep and special partnership [with the EU] that takes in both economic and security cooperation”. But she then warned:

In security terms a failure to reach agreement would mean our cooperation in the fight against crime and terrorism would be weakened.

Numerous commentators have taken this statement, and the UK government’s conflation of economic and security cooperation, as a veiled threat. Because it suggests that continued security cooperation may hinge on the UK getting a good economic deal in Brexit negotiations.

Home Secretary Amber Rudd did nothing to ease this concern in subsequent comments. Rudd insisted the UK wasn’t threatening the EU. But she then warned that, if the UK left Europol – the EU-wide law enforcement agency, we would “take our information” with us. Brexit Secretary David Davis, meanwhile, has also acknowledged that security cooperation could end.

The elephant in the room

Yet almost all the coverage of May’s “threat” has failed to make one important connection. And as that link only happened a week ago, it’s a difficult one to miss. That connection is the Westminster attack.

On 22 March, the UK faced its own terrorist attack, when an assailant drove his car through pedestrians on Westminster Bridge. He then attacked a police officer with a knife. Three civilians and one police officer died as a result. The incident rocked the nation.

The government now stands accused of using, as a bargaining chip, the very security cooperation that could thwart another attack happening across the EU and in a post-Brexit UK. After the Westminster attack, May vowed that terrorists “will not defeat us”. But surely, cutting off the flow of intelligence with the EU that pertains to serious crimes and terrorism investigations is at odds with that goal.

The government seems to have a disconnect between what happened in Westminster and the demands it seeks to place on the EU. These two issues are, however, related. It’s in everyone’s best interests to acknowledge and deal with that. Before we make deals we’re going to have to live with for years to come.

Get Involved

Support The Canary if you appreciate the work we do.

Featured image via Presidenza del Consiglio/Wikimedia

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed