Karma strikes the judge who thought sexual assault was fine because the attacker didn’t enjoy it

judge
Support us and go ad-free

A Mexican judge recently caused outrage for a very controversial decision. In a sexual assault case, he ordered a suspect’s liberation because he claimed there was no ‘sexual intent’ behind the attack. But karma has now struck, with authorities suspending him and stepping in to investigate.

The judge’s argument

The assailant in question allegedly touched the breasts of a 17-year-old girl and penetrated her with his fingers on 1 January 2015. But Judge Anuar González Hemadi argued that authorities should release him because he had shown “no carnal intent” or desire to “copulate” when he did so. In other words, that he hadn’t done it for his own enjoyment. For González, the attacker didn’t deserve jail time for sexual abuse, because he was only guilty of “incidental touching”. He said:

an incidental touching or fondling will not be considered sexual acts, if proof is not presented that it was done to satisfy a sexual desire.

The alleged attacker and three other wealthy men in their 20s had abducted the victim outside a club and dragged her into a black Mercedes. She claims two of these men sexually assaulted her in the car, before a third raped her upon arrival at one of their homes. She says the attackers pushed her, took away her phone, and laughed when she pleaded with them to stop.

Mexicans responded to the judge’s decision with anger on social media. And many questioned whether the wealth and influence of the suspect’s family had played a key role in the ruling.

“A precedent for impunity”

Judicial authorities announced on 29 March that they had suspended González. But for some, the damage had already been done. The Network for Children’s Rights in Mexico called the ruling “absurd”, and said:

This ruling represents a serious step backward in the access to justice for girls and adolescent women who are victims of sexual violence, and sets a precedent for impunity.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

But perceived impunity is nothing new in Mexico. In fact, this particular case only arrived in court after the victim’s father started a public campaign denouncing the attackers. This led to significant media coverage; and authorities finally brought charges against the men in question.

An environment of impunity

A critical Amnesty International report from 2016, meanwhile, shows a general environment of impunity in Mexico today. The group said that police officers had illegally arrested, tortured, and sexually abused dozens of women. But it claimed that authorities had only prosecuted a small number of the perpetrators. There are also numerous other cases – not necessarily involving sexual assault – which reveal what Al Jazeera has called “an apparent culture of impunity that allows some in Mexican law enforcement to detain and kill at will”.

Amnesty’s 2016/2017 report on Mexico reflected this reality, saying:

There continued to be reports of torture and other ill-treatment, enforced disappearances, extrajudicial executions and arbitrary detentions. Impunity persisted for human rights violations and crimes under international law… Violence against women remained a major concern…

In short, there is not only “major concern” in Mexico over sexual violence today. There’s a whole environment of impunity. And while karma may have hit Judge González for his appalling recent ruling, it’s difficult to say that a profound change in Mexico’s environment of impunity will come any time soon.

Get Involved!

– Support organisations like the Rape & Sexual Abuse Support Centre, The Survivors Trust, and Victim Support. And for more information on dealing with sexual abuse, see here.

– Join the White Ribbon Campaign; which aims to “educate and raise awareness of violence against women, and to engage men in these issues”.

– Have conversations with the women and men in your life; and refuse to tolerate misogyny in your communities and workplaces. This starts and ends with us.

– Read more of The Canary‘s reporting on Mexico. And see more Global articles on Facebook and Twitter.

Read about the Ayotzinapa case (the forced disappearance of 43 student teachers); which the current Mexican government has tried to sweep under the carpet. See more on human rights in Mexico from Amnesty International.

Featured image via Pixabay

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed