Data showing UK surveillance export licenses reveals that British companies are supplying snooping tools to countries that have a habit of locking up their opponents. And critics claim these exports make the UK complicit in human rights abuses around the world.
The UK has been accused of being a surveillance state. It’s an ongoing debate that started when Edward Snowden showed us how paranoid we need to be. And May’s last legislative venture, as The Canary reported, made us into a “world leading arsehole”.
And it seems that this is no exaggeration.
Advocacy organisation Privacy International (PI) note that the UK: “tends to be the democratic (and sometimes undemocratic) testing ground for new surveillance policy and technologies”. According to PI:
This is very important at a global level, particularly as the UK tends to act as a model for other countries: surveillance policy that starts here spreads across the world.
But it is not just policy spreading from the UK but a booming surveillance export market as well. Recent findings from Motherboard have shown just how far the reach is. And some of the licenses granted have gone to countries such as Egypt, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia that all have dubious human rights records to the least.
Should we be worried?
One of the licence categories granted by the UK Department for International Trade (DIT) falls under telecommunications. These are granted under Standard Individual Export Licences – export licenses that apply to controlled goods such as “military” and “torture goods”.
According to Motherboard’s data, DIT has granted 45 different countries with 149 telecommunications export licenses. 46 of those licenses have been for IMSI-catchers or IMSI-grabbers – phone monitoring kits that intercept communications.
Civil liberty campaigners view IMSI-catchers with concern. This was evident when reports of seven police forces in the UK using the technology came out.
West Mercia police and crime commissioner John Campion admitted:
Some tactics police use to keep people safe and bring criminals to justice can be intrusive and it is crucial that there are robust safeguards, framed by legislation, around this work, and there are.
And while there are concerns about UK police forces using this technology, this is amplified in human rights abusing countries. And this is particularly relevant because many human rights abuses do not stand in isolation from their culture of surveillance.
Turkey, for instance, abuses surveillance capabilities causing human rights concerns. Human Rights Watch criticised Saudi Arabia for installing spyware on phones to crackdown on government protesters. And reports equate UAE’s secret surveillance programme with a police state. In addition, Bangladesh has come under fire because its security agency has used brutal tactics on dissidents using surveillance tools. Egypt and Algeria also have bad track records. The list is not exhaustive. But all have received telecommunications licenses from the UK.
Bad news for free expression
In these circumstances, surveillance, censorship and human rights abuses go hand in hand. And the evidence is these foreign governments are deliberately spying on legitimate opponents to the state, in order to crackdown and create political prisoners.
Matthew Rice, an advocacy officer from PI, said:
There need to be stronger human rights considerations in place for any proposed transfer of surveillance technology, including an assessment of the suitability of the law in the receiving country and the current human rights framework in place. At the moment the assessment criteria is failing to prevent transfers that should clearly not take place.
There is a logical deduction that a free-for-all export strategy could make the UK complicit in any human rights abuses that take place as a result of using surveillance technology it exports. Britain is already in court over its export licenses for arms sold to Saudi Arabia. It could just be a matter of time before their surveillance trade also comes under scrutiny.
– Support the Campaign Opposing Police Surveillance
– Support the Network for Police Monitoring
– Read more Canary articles on Surveillance.
Featured image via Elvert Barnes/Flickr
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?