The Education Secretary is giving an extra £1.3bn to schools, by stealing it from their own budgets

Justine Greening
Support us and go ad-free

On Monday 17 July, Education Secretary Justine Greening announced an “additional” £1.3bn for front-line school spending. But far from being extra money, she is actually just taking the cash from existing school budgets; and forcing local authorities to pick up much of the outstanding bill.

We don’t need no dodgy budgets

Greening said in a statement that:

There will… be an additional £1.3 billion for schools and high needs across 2018-19 and 2019-20, in addition to the schools budget set at Spending Review 2015. This funding is across the next two years as we transition to the NFF [National Funding Formula].

She said this was because the government “believes that all children should have an education that unlocks their potential”. But instead of ‘unlocking’ new cash, Greening is taking the money from existing Department for Education (DfE) budgets.

We don’t need no thought control

The £1.3bn will be taken from the following:

  • £420m “efficiency savings” from the DfE capital budget. £315m of this will come from the Healthy Pupils Capital Programme, which is central government money for schools to spend on sports facilities.
  • £280m from the ‘free schools’ budget. But instead of scrapping the schools altogether, the DfE will now make local authorities pay for 30 of the 140 planned free schools.
  • £600m over two years from the DfE resource budget. This is the money the DfE has for day-to-day spending and administration.

No dark sarcasm in the classroom

This is likely to cause controversy among parents and teachers alike; because teaching unions are already warning about funding cuts due to the new NFF. As The Canary previously reported, the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) says the NFF will mean funding per pupil will be cut by as much as 7% by 2022:

Taking account of forecast growth in pupil [numbers], this equates to a real-terms cut in spending per pupil of 2.8% between 2017–18 and 2021–22. Adding this to past cuts makes for a total real-terms cut to per-pupil spending of around 7%…

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

These cuts will affect children in the most deprived areas the greatest. And the IFS also noted that:

[The NFF is] the largest cut in school spending per pupil over a four-year period since at least the early 1980s.

But the “additional” £1.3bn that Greening has promised will only increase per pupil spending across all schools by 0.5% a year (and by 3% in schools that are classed as “underfunded”). So, in theory, Greening is still cutting per pupil spending in all schools by 6.5%.

Hey! Greening! Leave them kids alone!

So Greening is firstly cutting per pupil funding with the NFF. And now, she’s ‘robbing Peter to pay Paul’, by slashing the DfE budget in other areas. And it looks like local councils and schools themselves will have to clean up the mess. For all the government’s talk of “unlocking” children’s “potential” and “talent”, the only thing it seems keen on ‘unlocking’ is yet more savings in the name of its ideological austerity regime.

Get Involved!

Read more from The Canary on education.

Join The Canary, so we can keep bringing you the news that matters.

Featured image via YouTube

Support us and go ad-free

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us

Comments are closed