Surprise, surprise. The media ‘accidentally’ pins the blame for cruel Tory policies on… Jeremy Corbyn

Support us and go ad-free

It turns out, the media ‘accidentally’ pinned the blame for cruel Tory policies on… Jeremy Corbyn. During the general election, outlets like The Guardian developed a bogus narrative that the Labour manifesto would increase inequality. The evidence was a chart produced by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS). In reality, the chart showed how Conservative legislation would be regressive for inequality, as shown by progressive thinktank the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR).

Media outrage

Media outlets such as The Guardian and The Independent blamed Labour for a rise in inequality shown in the chart.

In The Independent, John Rentoul claimed the chart showed the “effect of the parties’ manifesto policies on the incomes of the rich and poor”. Leaning on the same data in The Guardian, Andrew Harrop announced the “disconcerting truth” that Labour’s manifesto would raise “living standards for the top half and cut them for the bottom”. Harrop is the general secretary of the right-wing Labour pressure group the Fabian Society.

The media furore did not end there. Top ITV presenter Robert Peston, for example, branded the chart the “most striking” IFS forecast, claiming “even Labour hurts poorest”:

Absolute bollocks

At a first glance, the graph appears to back up the mainstream media pundits. The red line seems to suggest that the poorer you are, the worse off you will be under the Labour manifesto.

But the conclusion that the Labour manifesto would increase inequality is wrong for two major reasons. Firstly, the data on each party includes the Conservative government’s “current plans”, such as the rolling out of Universal Credit (UC). UC is the government’s flagship welfare ‘reform’, which actually represents a huge cut to ordinary people’s support.

The IFS combines incoming legislation from the Conservatives with each party’s manifesto commitments. It does not look at each manifesto commitment in isolation. So, in short, each line in the chart is lumbered with the current plans of the Conservative government.

Even more ridiculous

Secondly, the IFS only analysed 8% of Labour’s spending commitments and 16% of its tax changes because that’s where effective distributional analysis could be carried out. So the conclusions are hardly representative of the Labour manifesto as a whole. Labour policies such as a £10 living wage, scrapping giveaways in inheritance tax and applying VAT to private schools would have a progressive impact. And they are a just a few examples of the many policies omitted from the IFS analysis, as thinktank the IPPR notes.

Blaming Corbyn for Tory cruelty

So the red line actually shows the impact of a small section of the Labour manifesto combined with the Conservatives’ ‘current plans’.

This means media pundits are in fact blaming Labour for Conservative policies. Labour pledged to “reform the whole process” of the benefits system [PDF, page 56]. But the red line in the chart includes the Conservatives’ hugely regressive Universal Credit system, for example. So the apparent regressive impact of the Labour manifesto shown in the chart is actually the result of the Conservative government’s plans.

The IPPR does not blame the IFS for the misinterpretation in the media. The IPPR points out that the IFS is “entirely transparent” on the data it used.

Yet Rentoul in The Independent used the chart to brand Corbyn “a right-wing Red Tory who offers no alternative to the government”.  The false narrative developed out of the chart is further evidence that even the less right-wing sections of our media will seize anything to damage the Labour leadership.

Extraordinarily, the media managed to blame Corbyn for Tory policies during the general election. Again, due diligence takes a backseat when the media bashes the Corbyn movement.

Get Involved!

– Donate to In Kind Direct, a charity that provides people with basic essentials from company donations.

– Contact your MP and be vocal on social media.

– Organise! Join (and participate in the activities of) a union, an activist group, and/or a political party.

– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.

Featured image via Chatham House

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed