The truth about the government’s Big Ben contractor and its leading role in the worker blacklisting scandal

Big Ben
Support us and go ad-free

Sir Robert McAlpine Ltd (SRM) was recently given the contract to refurbish Big Ben. Now, evidence (some of it confidential) seen by The Canary, together with court and inquiry transcripts, suggests SRM’s role in blacklisting was far greater than previously thought. And this poses the question of whether the company should retain this contract – and any other public sector ones.

The blacklisting industry

In 2016, SRM and other construction companies offered an out-of-court settlement of just under £80m to workers who claimed they were blacklisted via The Consulting Association (TCA). Blacklisting is another name for vetting people, to deny them work because of their politics or union activism.

Over a 16-year period, TCA compiled a secret database of workers – here’s a sample file (supplied anonymously):

Blacklistng: sample record


In 2009, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) raided TCA and manager Ian Kerr was subsequently prosecuted for failing to notify the ICO of his data controller role. He pleaded guilty and was fined £5,000, with additional costs.

According to [pdf] author Phil Chamberlain, the ICO seized the TCA database, which included [pdf p6] details of 3,213 workers. Companies that subscribed to TCA’s service included Carillion, Balfour Beatty, Skanska, Kier, Costain, McAlpine and more than 30 others.

Missing files?

Before he died in December 2012, Kerr agreed to hand over several TCA documents to the Scottish Affairs Committee’s inquiry [pdf] into blacklisting in employment, to which he gave testimony [pdf].

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

But a handwritten note (anonymously supplied) by Kerr suggests he intended to destroy TCA files (the crucial words are “destroy data” in the fifth line of the second paragraph):

blacklisting: destroy files note

McAlpine interrogation

In January 2013, a Scottish Affairs Committee inquiry into blacklisting called Cullum McAlpine, Director of Sir Robert McAlpine Ltd, to give sworn evidence.

During the hearing, McAlpine confirmed that SRM had been a member of TCA’s predecessor, the Economic League. He also confirmed he was the first chairman of TCA and retained that post for three years, from 1993 until 1996.

But the chair of the inquiry queried these dates:

The dates quoted by the chair match those referred to in the 2013-15 High Court hearing [pdf p7] between construction workers and companies. The hearing also confirmed [pdf p7] that TCA “Executive meetings generally took place at McAlpines’ [sic] offices”.

Funding and finances

At another point in that hearing, Cullum McAlpine was asked about how SRM funded the blacklisting operations:

But confidential TCA documents show [pdf] the precise amount in fees paid from 1997 to 2009 by members. For SRM, these came to over £200,000.

And when TCA was wound up in 2009, there was a shortfall of about £20,000 [pdf p17] that was met by SRM.

The inquiry further interrogated McAlpine about the money paid on SRM’s behalf by its HR Manager, Dave Cochrane, to Mary Kerr, to cover her husband’s fines and legal fees. McAlpine’s answers on this were equivocal. But the precise sums can be found in a copy of an email [pdf] to Mrs Kerr from Cochrane.

Further damning evidence

The 2013-15 High Court document stated [pdf p19]:

In 2007 and early 2008, under the chairmanship of Mr Cochrane, discussions took place regarding the future of the Consulting Association. During those discussions it was suggested that the Consulting Association could adopt a legitimate front whilst keeping its blacklisting function clandestine.

And that [pdf p19]:

Mr Cochrane said that if Mr McAlpine’s name was mentioned McAlpines might encounter serious difficulty in obtaining major construction contracts.

Central blacklisting role

Indeed, as stated in the 2013 High Court document, SRM played [pdf p18] a “central role in the establishment and operation of the Consulting Association”.

And in the sworn testimony of Mary Kerr in 2016, she stated [pdf p20]:

David Cochrane had by far the most contact with Ian during this period and he always made clear that it was in the best interests of the member companies for Ian to be in the frame’, otherwise the publicity would badly hit the companies, including Sir Robert McAlpine.

She added [pdf p22]:

I felt that David Cochrane placed pressure on Ian throughout to keep the companies’ names and Cullum McAlpine’s name out of the limelight as much as possible.

SRM and Big Ben

Given SRM’s role in the blacklisting operations of TCA, unions are now calling for the £29m Big Ben contract to be rescinded. And Labour MPs Jack Dromey and Chuka Umunna agree.

GMB General Secretary Tim Roache said:

This is a company that hid from its victims, the justice system and from parliamentary scrutiny for years. To see it being rewarded with a public contract to refurbish Big Ben adds insult to injury for GMB members who have seen themselves and their families suffer as a result of the disgraceful practice of blacklisting.

Indeed, a ban should be extended to all companies practising blacklisting. And there is still the not-so-small matter of the thousands of workers blacklisted by the Economic League.

Conservative Business Minister Margot James said:

The government takes this issue extremely seriously and hopes [blacklisting] will become a thing of the past. We are not complacent. Blacklisting of trade union members and activists is completely unacceptable and has absolutely no part to play in modern employment relations.

The Canary contacted SRM about its precise role in the blacklisting operations, but received no reply by the time of publication.

Get Involved!

– Read more on blacklisting at The Canary.

– And read Spies at Work (a history of the Economic League) by Mike Hughes and Blacklisted by Phil Chamberlain

Featured image via Flickr Creative Commons

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed