Prime Minister Theresa May has struggled to hold her party together over Brexit. She has suffered attacks from Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson and Chancellor Phillip Hammond. As she tries to hide the split in her cabinet, now Home Secretary Amber Rudd has ripped it wide open.
While I believe it is profoundly in all our interests for the negotiations to succeed, it is also our responsibility as a government to prepare for every eventuality. So that is exactly what we are doing. These white papers also support that work, including setting out steps to minimise disruption for businesses…
This provoked Hammond to openly contradict her in a Times article shortly afterwards. Now, Home Secretary Rudd has stated her disapproval. Speaking to the Commons Home Affairs select committee, Rudd was asked about plans for a no deal scenario. Her reply was stark:
I think it is unthinkable there would be no deal. It is so much in their interests as well as ours – in their communities’, families’, tourists’ interests to have something in place.
A party split down the middle
While Rudd, Hammond and various others contest the PM’s statements on a ‘no deal’ situation, other Conservatives support them. Brexit Secretary David Davis has made repeated statements promoting this outcome. Leadership hopeful Jacob Rees-Mogg suggested walking away from negotiations “without paying them a brass farthing”. This is reflective of the history of the Conservative Party, which has been divided over Europe since the 19th century.
It’s still not clear what the UK actually wants in terms of a new relationship, because on the one hand it seems that the UK wants to have a close trading relationship with Europe like it has now, but it also seems to want something different.
As May falters, her party is pulling apart. And it seems they don’t even know themselves what Brexit should look like.
– Read more Canary articles about Brexit here.
– Join us so we can continue to bring you the news that matters.
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?