A top lawyer has just commenced legal action and the outcome for Brexit could be explosive

Brexit barrel

A legal challenge could see the reopening of an inquiry into the funding arrangements of a pro-Brexit campaign. And an investigation by the Electoral Commission into a second campaign has begun. Potentially, both could question the legitimacy of the 2016 EU referendum.

The investigations

The Good Law Project, led by Jo Maugham QC, has requested a judicial review [pdf] of the Electoral Commission’s inquiries into how Vote Leave used its funds. This could see the multi-million-pound funding come under intense scrutiny; and could even affect the standing of government ministers Boris Johnson and Michael Gove, who were closely associated with that campaign.

Separately, the Electoral Commission has agreed to examine certain OpenDemocracy allegations; specifically, about how Arron Banks was able to furnish multi-million-pound donations to the Leave.EU campaign, fronted by UKIP’s Nigel Farage.

Other alleged irregularities

OpenDemocracy also claims that Better for the Country Limited (BFTCL), the company that ran Leave.EU, bought almost £2m of pro-Brexit merchandise. Elsewhere, it’s claimed that BFTCL donated £2,359,842.76 to five referendum campaigners.

But BFTCL was not registered as a permitted participant in the EU referendum. And it was fined by the Information Commissioner’s Office for dispatching half a million pro-Leave texts.

EC investigation into Brexit funding

Banks commented:

Read on...

we believe that a judge-led inquiry reporting to Parliament that investigates the main campaign groups, Vote Leave, Remain, and Leave.EU would be the best way to clear this nonsense up once and for all.

And that’s not all

OpenDemocracy further alleged that stories claiming BBC anti-Brexit bias emanate from News-watch. However, this is not BBC Newswatch, but a “media analyst” site directly promoted by Leave.EU. And a News-watch sub-site, BBC Complaints, invites viewers to send complaints about BBC bias to – you guessed it – the BBC.

David Keighley, News-watch‘s managing director, told OpenDemocracy:

News-watch is funded by a variety of sources but works independently and has never been under any pressure from any funding source to modify any of its findings.

Kathy Gyngell, a fellow of the Centre for Policy Studies (CPS), helped set up News-watch. As reported by The Canary, the CPS co-sponsored a 2016 report [pdf] advocating a no-deal Brexit.

Confusing the populace

The Canary also reported a study [pdf] on how automated computer programmes manipulate public opinion. An earlier report revealed how EU referendum voters were manipulated by ‘bots’.

And a third study identified [pdf, p6] artificial intelligence specialist Cambridge Analytica (CA) as a key player in this technology. According to Banks, CA’s technology and US consultant Gerry Gunster were the driving force behind Leave.EU’s campaign. And Leave.EU document The science behind our strategy” reveals the intended relationship between CA and Leave.EU.

Now, it’s claimed that 13,000 Twitter bots posted 65,000 Brexit messages prior to the EU referendum. According to researchers Marco Bastos and Dan Mercea of City, University of London, these operated as a ‘supervised network of zombie agents’. Parliament is inquiring into this too.


Duncan Hames, director of policy at Transparency International UK, commented:

the referendum campaigns were dominated by big money on either side of the debate…. over half of reported donations to referendum campaigners came from just ten people, with only a hundred donors accounting for almost all of the reported contributions…

Arguably, Britain’s EU referendum was also manipulated via lies and disinformation. However, this is not simply about overspends, but the subversion of how we participate in a democracy. And these latest investigations may strengthen the argument for another referendum.

Get Involved!

Read more from The Canary on Brexit.

Featured image via Flickr Creative Commons

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed