Theresa May reportedly cancelled her cabinet meeting on 7 November. Just as, in fact, new information emerged about Priti Patel’s undisclosed meetings with Israeli officials. Information that one commentator has described as the “final straw”.
The Conservative government has faced numerous problems of late. One is that the International Development Secretary, Patel, admitted she held 12 undisclosed meetings with officials in Israel while on holiday there in August.
So the government certainly has a fair amount to talk about. But according to The Daily Mail‘s Political Editor Jason Groves, it rejected the opportunity to do so on 7 November; because the planned cabinet meeting didn’t go ahead:
Cabinet cancelled this morning. Probably for the best in the circs where 2 ministers facing calls to resign + a third is under investigation
— Jason Groves (@JasonGroves1) November 7, 2017
Groves suggests the choice to cancel the meeting was “probably for the best”. But given the outcry about a further disclosure in the Patel situation, getting their heads together may have been wise.
Patel failed to declare the meetings, including with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, prior to them taking place. She has apologised for not following protocol. But Patel and the government have essentially tried to downplay the situation. The Department for International Development (DfID) said:
The FCO [Foreign Office] are clear that UK interests were not damaged or affected by the meetings on this visit…
But it turns out that Patel returned from Israel with one particular interest in mind. Because she apparently asked DfID if it was possible to give aid to the Israeli military in the Golan Heights.
This area is an occupied territory. Occupied, in fact, by the very country that Patel asked to give aid to. Israel seized the Golan Heights from Syria in the 1967 war. And the UK doesn’t officially recognise that Israel has any claim to the area for that reason. But Patel wants UK taxpayers to give money to the occupier of the territory.
No wonder she didn’t initially disclose much about those meetings.
The “final straw” for Patel?
The Prime Minister’s spokesperson confirmed the reports, saying:
The secretary of state did discuss potential ways to provide medical support for Syrian refugees who are wounded and who cross into the Golan for aid. The Israeli army runs field hospitals there… But there is no change in policy in the area. The UK does not provide any financial support to the Israeli army.
But Labour’s Shadow International Development Secretary Kate Osamor told Middle East Eye that Patel’s actions were “deeply alarming”. And she said they raise “urgent questions” about what happened in Patel’s meetings with Israeli officials. MP Andy Slaughter, a vice-chair of the Labour Friends of Palestine and the Middle East, also said:
News that Priti Patel used her secret meeting in Israel to advocate sending aid to support the work of the IDF [Israeli army] in the occupied Golan Heights should be the final straw for her…
Is it over?
It’s hard to see how the government can take many more scandals and remain standing. Patel’s revelations follow the Westminster ‘sex pest’ scandal, which involves ministers, MPs and Conservative Party officials. And Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson is also facing calls to resign after making inaccurate comments that could potentially double a woman’s prison sentence.
But whatever fate awaits the government, one thing is for sure. The UK should not be ploughing aid money into a brutal, occupying military force. Because aid is meant to go to the oppressed – not the oppressor.
– Find out more about Israel’s occupation with the Palestine Solidarity Campaign.
– Join The Canary if you appreciate the work we do.
Featured image via David Mirzoeff
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?