Conservative Vice Chair for Youth Ben Bradley has deleted his account on professional networking site LinkedIn. But unfortunately for the MP, he removed the online profile only after political website SKWAWKBOX exposed its contents.
The LinkedIn profile
Sorry but how many children you have is a choice; if you can’t afford them, stop having them! Vasectomies are free
Responding to widespread criticism, Bradley claimed that he was only 21 at the time “with no real responsibilities”. But his LinkedIn profile suggested otherwise:
According to his own profile, Bradley was ultimately responsible for the welfare of 2,000 students up until August 2012. That doesn’t quite sound like someone with no responsibilities. The Canary contacted Bradley for comment, but received none by the time of publication.
He stands by it
Bradley’s 2012 blogpost also read:
Families who have never worked a day in their lives having four or five kids and the rest of us having one or two means it’s not long before we’re drowning in a vast sea of unemployed wasters that we pay to keep!
In the recent video, Bradley condemned his “immature” language, although he said [3:12] he upheld the “broad point” he was making about people on benefits. Still, a parliamentary watchdog slammed Bradley himself for misusing taxpayer funds in 2017.
And for many, there’s a broader point about a different kind of ‘benefits bill’. A £93bn annual corporate welfare bill that we pay to corporations in subsidies and tax breaks, including Amazon and other huge multinationals. Many of these businesses are already making untold profits on top of the taxpayer handouts they receive from the Conservative government. Yet Bradley wants us to focus on families with little power or purchase in society. And that’s from a man who has deleted his entire employment history because it doesn’t add up with what he says today. Jog on.
– Join The Canary so we can keep holding the powerful to account.
Featured image via WikiCommons
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?