The editor of the BBC’s Marr Show tells viewers ‘balance’ is not ‘desirable’ [VIDEO]

Marr Show
Kerry-anne Mendoza

The editor of BBC political programme The Andrew Marr Show has told viewers that balance is not “desirable”. The comments came after the show aired an interview with a controversial guest but did not invite anyone to contest or balance her views.

The interview

Claire Kober was the Labour council leader in Haringey who recently resigned before an investigation into her competence. At the heart of the issue was local life in Haringey. Kober was about to take the majority of Haringey’s public assets and pop them in a private fund worth £2bn. The council would manage the so-called Haringey Development Vehicle (HDV) alongside multinational property developer Lendlease.

What does that mean? As Aditya Chakrabortty explains in The Guardian:

Unprecedented in its scale and scope, the HDV will chuck families out of their homes, rip apart local communities and shut down shops and businesses. Its proponents cannot be described as moderates, any more than Thatcher’s sell-off of our water and electricity can be described as moderate policies.

Understandably, locals felt strongly that Labour should protect rather than imperil public assets and services. So they used every tool of their democracy to stop the plans.

Some might call that democracy in action. But not the conservative or (large sections of) the liberal press. Kober has been given prominence across the mainstream media, along with her claims that it was all a sexist witch hunt by the far left; a purge of the Blairites, instigated by Momentum.

Now, instead of talking about the dangers of the HDV and privatisation, the press is back in its comfort zone – demonising left-wing politics.


The Daily Mail wrote in outrage about this alleged sexism on the part of Momentum. This from a paper which routinely publishes breathless articles about teen actresses being ‘totally unrecognisable’ (almost legally shaggable) along with the standard sexualised images. And of course, The New Statesman gave Kober a column to rewrite history too. Never mind that women in the local community felt so passionately about the issue that they spoke out:

For the local community and people with an eye on the facts of the case, this is annoying. But it’s not surprising from partisan outlets.

The BBC, however, has a duty to impartiality and balance.

But on Sunday 4 February, the BBC invited Kober onto the Marr Show, unchallenged. There was no representative from the Labour Party, Momentum, Haringey Council, or the local community to counter her arguments.

Former BBC and Channel 4 News journalist Paul Mason criticised the move:

And when a viewer asked the show’s editor Rob Burley to explain the decision, they received a bizarre response.

Marr Show Editor Rob Burley tweets about balance

Missing the point

Rob Burley clearly missed a staff memo, because this matter was argued and settled last August. BBC Radio 4 carried an interview with former Conservative chancellor and renowned climate change sceptic Nigel Lawson. The hosts permitted Lawson, unchallenged, to make false claims to support his position that climate change doesn’t exist. After public complaint, the BBC apologised, and admitted it had breached its “guidelines on accuracy and impartiality”.

Just months later, a senior editor has not only committed the same error, but doesn’t seem to care. Because when other viewers challenged Burley’s stance, he gave similarly flippant responses.

This does not show a commitment to balanced news reporting. And that’s simply not good enough.

Get Involved!

– You can send your complaint to the BBC here.

– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.

– Read and support other independent media outlets:

Media DiversifiedNovara MediaCorporate WatchRed PepperNew InternationalistCommon SpaceMedia LensBella CaledoniaVox PoliticalEvolve PoliticsReal MediaReel NewsSTRIKE! magazineThe Bristol CableThe Meteor, The SkwawkboxSalford StarThe Ferret.

Featured image via screengrab

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed