Britain warned it could face another Cambridge Analytica scandal come general election time

Cambridge Analytica electoral system
Steve Topple

The UK has been warned that the Cambridge Analytica scandal could be repeated by “malicious influencers” at the next general election.

Make Votes Matter campaigns for reform of the first past the post (FPTP) voting system used for UK general elections. It says proportional representation would be a fairer system. But now, it has warned that FPTP “offers illicit online influencers, and even foreign powers, the ideal environment in which to influence our ballots”.

A whistleblower’s revelations

A whistleblower claimed that data firm Cambridge Analytica had access to harvested data from millions of Facebook users. As BBC News reported, Christopher Wylie said it then went on to use the data to psychologically profile people and deliver pro-Donald Trump material to them.

Start your day with The Canary News Digest

Fresh and fearless; get excellent independent journalism from The Canary, delivered straight to your inbox every morning.

The Guardian reported:

A linked investigation by undercover reporters at Channel 4 News revealed the head of Cambridge Analytica, Alexander Nix, boasting of using dirty tricks to swing elections… he talked about creating sex scandals and using fake news to swing votes.

Continue reading below...

The report was followed by revelations of its role in the US elections – a senior member of staff claimed the firm was behind the ‘defeat crooked Hilary’ ad campaign – and of its parent company’s activities in Nigerian politics.

“Illicit social media campaigning”

Make Votes Matter has highlighted how the use of data in a way similar to Cambridge Analytica could influence a general election result. Owen Winter from Make Votes Matter told The Canary:

Our analysis reveals that tiny changes in voting behaviour in key geographical areas could have dramatically changed the results of the 2017 General Election. This creates the perfect environment for illicit social media campaigning to swing election outcomes.

The cross-party campaign’s analysis points out that the Conservative Party would have won an overall majority if just 533 people had have voted differently in the right places. Whilst Jeremy Corbyn would have won a majority if just 0.16% of voters had opted for his party over the Conservatives (51,072). 31 constituencies were won with a majority of fewer than 500 votes.

It is these tiny swings, where user-specific targeted social media campaigning could influence people’s voting decision, which Make Votes Matter is concerned about.

Currently, there is no evidence of Cambridge Analytica influencing UK elections. The information commissioners office is waiting to search the company’s premises.

A “threat to democracy”

But Make Votes Matter believes that a system of proportional representation would help protect the UK from external interference by ensuring that a tiny group of swing voters do not hold the keys to power. As Winter said:

We face a fresh threat to democracy. Shadowy groups are exploiting technology – data harvesting, targeted ads, bots and fake news – to ruthlessly target and influence those voters without oversight or accountability.

With a proportional voting system which makes every vote count, it would take millions of voters to alter the final result. But in our laughably outdated voting system, targeting and influencing a few voters in the right places can decide a government.

Featured image via Thought Catalog/Flickr and secretlondon123/Wikimedia 

Since you're here ...

We know you don't need a lecture. You wouldn't be here if you didn't care.
Now, more than ever, we need your help to challenge the rightwing press and hold power to account. Please help us survive and thrive.

The Canary Support

Comments are closed