On Friday 26 May, ex-English Defence League (EDL) leader Tommy Robinson was arrested while live-streaming outside Leeds Crown Court. He was subsequently imprisoned for 13 months for contempt of court and breaching a suspended sentence.
Since then, the far right has spouted a lot of conspiratorial nonsense. And the legal profession has taken to Twitter to patiently attempt to explain why these people have got it completely wrong.
The “media blackout”
First up, there was the so-called media blackout. Robinson’s supporters screamed about a “media blackout” and “secret courts”. There was indeed a temporary reporting restriction in place over his imprisonment:
Tommy Robinson jailed: Judicial Office confirms that Judge Marson QC has partly lifted reporting restrictions he imposed last week. It can now be reported that Yaxley-Lennon admitted contempt of court and breaching suspended sentence conditions. More here https://t.co/BC3DluHnne
— Joshua Rozenberg (@JoshuaRozenberg) May 29, 2018
But this was to protect the trial Robinson was live streaming from, not to hush up the fact of his arrest. As one lawyer pointed out, contempt laws exist to ensure defendants have fair trials:
@JoshuaRozenberg was v clear on the Tommy Robinson contempt on BBC 5 live & the UK approach to postpone reporting in cases where needed to shelter the Jury from uniformed media comment is a good one. It ensures a fair trial & if guilty the court deciding that on actual evidence
— Robin Murray (@robinthemint) May 30, 2018
And as Stephanie Finnegan, a journalist who covered the case, highlighted:
He livestreamed to a very large audience, making prejudicial and even inaccurate comments. He did this within earshot of jurors turning up to court. If they did not hear him then, they could certainly stumble upon the video online. He encouraged it to be shared widely.
— Stephanie Finnegan (@StephanieFinneg) May 29, 2018
Barrister Adam Wagner, meanwhile, argued that Robinson’s actions were purely self-motivated:
17/ The worst part is that Robinson appears to have done this all for self-interested reasons. If he cared about securing convictions for the defendants then he wouldn't have risked derailing the entire trial for his ranting broadcasts. This is a fundamentally selfish exercise.
— Adam Wagner (@AdamWagner1) May 29, 2018
In fact, Robinson’s interference with a previous trial (for which he received the suspended sentence), risked causing the case to collapse.
No legal advice
Others from the ‘poor Tommy brigade’ claimed he wasn’t given proper legal advice. Luckily, lawyers were on hand to correct them. Conservative councillor and lawyer Gareth Anderson stated:
So Yaxley-Lennon WAS represented in court (far right conspiracy theory nailed), no record of the judge saying he doesn't care if Yaxley-Lennon dies in prison (another lie nailed), & he ADMITTED the offence he was charged with (not looking good for the conspiracy theorists here). https://t.co/eZ3Yq5Zgl9
— Cllr Gareth Anderson (@GarethJAnderson) May 29, 2018
Meanwhile, ‘The Secret Barrister’ put Twitter users straight on how the law works:
Oh my dear sweet Lauren.
1) Defendants are not “assigned prosecution barristers”. This is just not a thing. Never, ever, never.
2) If his lawyer “told him to plead innocent or contest”, they would be a pretty lousy lawyer as those concepts don’t exist in English law.
Love SB x pic.twitter.com/YmlN0duK3C
— The Secret Barrister (@BarristerSecret) May 29, 2018
And as they further pointed out, the rules on contempt are different:
Oh my dear sweet Raheem.
1) No-one is “charged” with contempt. It is a purely judicial function.
2) We don’t have “public defenders” in England and Wales. He was represented by a very experienced independent criminal barrister.
3) “Duress of arrest” is not a thing.
Love SB x pic.twitter.com/pVMuzdH8s2
— The Secret Barrister (@BarristerSecret) May 29, 2018
Ignorance is not bliss
As a former barrister pointed out, much of the ignorance shown is due to people not having a basic understanding of the law:
The Tommy Robinson episode is yet another example of the paucity of public legal education. Much of the nonsense on here could be avoided by people having a basic understanding of how the justice system works instead of conflating it with American TV shows.
— Ishan Kolhatkar (@BPTC_Lecturer) May 30, 2018
The Secret Barrister, meanwhile, has written an account of what people should know about the case. But here are a few bullet points from a journalist who’s spent a lot of time in courts:
- Contempt of court laws exist to ensure defendants have a fair trial. As journalists, we respect this law as it means we do not prejudice the outcome of court cases.
- Robinson was arrested for breach of the peace but ended up being sentenced for contempt of court. This is common practice. The police often arrest for one offence but pursue another once they and the Crown Prosecution Service have looked at the evidence.
- Robinson pleaded guilty and was sentenced straight away. Again, this is common practice with a guilty plea, especially one that activates a suspended sentence.
- He received legal advice and was represented. Although they can apply for “audience rights“, most solicitors cannot represent defendants at Crown Court. This is done by barristers. There is no such thing as a “prosecution barrister” for a defendant.
The serious side
Robinson’s actions may be both idiotic and self-serving. But he is gathering support. At the time of writing, a petition calling for his release has over half a million signatures.
So let’s be clear. This is not an attack on free speech. This is not an attack on freedom of the press. Tommy Robinson is not a martyr. And there are no grand conspiracies regarding his imprisonment.
And it’s down to all of us to challenge this nonsense and make sure it’s not used to further the cause of the far right.
– Support grassroots action against fascism.
Featured image via screengrab
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?