The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has been criticised by parliament for a “disturbing front” that is opening up on the front line of the roll-out of one of its most ‘brutal‘ reforms: Universal Credit.
Flawed by design
The Work and Pensions Select Committee has published a report into the DWP’s treatment of domestic violence survivors claiming Universal Credit. It took evidence from front-line DWP staff who are members of the Public and Commercial Services (PCS) union. Overall, both the committee and the PCS were critical of the DWP’s current approach to domestic violence survivors. This was particularly in the context of Universal Credit’s ‘single household payment policy’; that is, all the money goes to the main claimant.
In its evidence, the PCS union said [pdf, p3]:
Training for staff who may have to deal with claimants experiencing domestic abuse is not adequate and in some cases does not exist.
Facilities in Jobcentres are not suitable for conducting sensitive interviews… There is a lack of specialists in this area…
[W]e believe that the fundamental problem is in the design of Universal Credit in that allows [sic] an abusive partner such extensive control of so much of a household’s income.
An “astonishing lack of understanding”
The latter part of its evidence rings true with what other organisations have said. As campaign group Sisters Uncut noted in 2015, Universal Credit means:
Abusive partners will be able to claim all benefits entitled to both of a couple… It will make victims/survivors of domestic violence significantly more vulnerable to economic abuse and financial dependence on their partners.
When challenged on this, ministers have stated that in cases of domestic violence, victims will be able to request to have their claim separated from their partner – this shows an astonishing lack of understanding on the part of the government about the dynamics of abusive relationships and the risk to the victim/survivor that may result from such a request.
Indeed, as the committee noted:
A split payment… is not necessarily helpful or indeed realistic or safe to implement. The claimant would need to be able to ‘explain’ the reason for a split payment to the abusive partner, and would need to set up their own bank account – difficult in itself – in order to receive the money.
- Up to one million low-paid workers being subject to the sanctions regime.
- Universal Credit being administered wholly online. This is when around 2.9 million disabled people (22%) have never used the internet.
- An increase in the sanctions regime, linked to the Health and Work Conversations.
- Some disabled people and couples losing up to £5,195 a year because of changes to entitlements.
- The effect of the benefit on people living with mental health issues – specifically possible forced therapy.
The DWP: enough is enough
The DWP told The Canary:
Abuse in any form is completely unacceptable and that is why we make sure all our staff are well trained and supported to help vulnerable people. We have specialist teams in every Jobcentre including those who can support victims of domestic violence and staff do everything they can to make sure people fleeing domestic abuse get the help they need as quickly as possible. That includes enabling urgent payments to be made for collection within two to three hours and transferring a person’s claim to a different Jobcentre.
Previous legacy benefits were also paid to one account and there’s no evidence that paying into one account increases the risk of domestic violence.
But the DWP has left Labour MP Frank Field, who chairs the Work and Pensions Select Committee, unimpressed. He said:
Another disturbing front is opening up in the implementation of… Universal Credit.
Up until now, the focus has been on how brutally some constituents are treated… Now we have the views from the other side of the counter… civil servants…
The lack of training and expertise at the front line in [Jobcentres] is a thread running through all of our benefits inquiries – and now it is becoming apparent to the public how this is leaving them unprepared to deal with the most vulnerable claimants.
The evidence that Universal Credit is failing catastrophically continues to mount. But for domestic violence survivors, its impact could be potentially life-threatening. It is surely time for the government to listen and take action.
– Read The Canary‘s full analysis of Universal Credit.
Featured image via DPAC and UK government – Wikimedia
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?