The BBC ignores 47 pieces of evidence to excuse the Tory MP who blocked the upskirting law

Chope and BBC
Support us and go ad-free

The BBC and other media outlets seem to have ignored 47 pieces of evidence to excuse the Conservative MP who blocked the upskirting law. On 15 June, Sir Christopher Chope provoked outrage by exploiting a parliamentary technicality to block a bill criminalising ‘upskirting’. Upskirting is when a person uses a camera to film or photograph a woman from under their skirt without their consent.

Ignoring 47 pieces of evidence

Alongside fellow Tory MP Philip Davies, who spoke for hours to break the time limit for the debate, Chope ensured that progress of the bill will be delayed. Sections of the media appear to be excusing the pair rather than exposing them, though. And ignoring 47 pieces of evidence in the process.

One BBC correspondent defended Chope because of his stance on private members bills. Private members bills are opportunities for backbenchers to introduce legislation to parliament. Parliamentary correspondent Mark D’Arcy wrote:

Sir Christopher is a leading member of a group of backbench Conservatives who make a practice of ensuring that what they see as well-meaning but flabby legislation is not lazily plopped on to the statute book by a few MPs on a poorly attended Friday sitting.

And – after all – this is a bill to create a new criminal offence, for which people can go to jail.

But there are bullet holes in this line of defence.

Blogger Tom Pride points out that Chope sponsored 47 private members bills himself in 2017, the same type of bill he objects to so much. These include legislation bringing new payment schemes to the NHS, and for the state to stop foreign vessels fishing in territorial waters. At the time, opposition MPs accused Chope of abusing the process by using up all the space allocated for private member’s bills. But Chope denied this, saying he genuinely wanted the proposals enacted.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

The BBC had not responded to The Canary‘s request for comment at the time of publication.

Not just the BBC

Sky News took a similar line:

Two of the most prominent figures on the libertarian Right of the Conservative Party, the pair regard many private members’ bills as politically correct, nanny state nonsense seeking to meddle in people’s lives and curb their personal freedom.

Yet you could hardly describe Chope’s voting record as libertarian. Chope has consistently voted against legalising same sex marriage. The Conservative MP has also voted for mass surveillance of ordinary citizens many times. And he co-proposed banning women from wearing a burka. So it seems Chope picks and chooses when the state should get involved.

The Mirror also repeated the Sky article that excuses Chope, an MP with a long history of scuppering legislation that protects women. In 2013, for example, Chope co-proposed diminishing sexual impropriety laws in the workplace. This is the person Theresa May awarded by making a knight bachelor in December 2017.

Chope’s other excuse

Another excuse parroted in the media comes from Chope himself. The MP allegedly told campaigner Gina Martin that he “wasn’t really sure” what upskirting was. But Chope and Davies spoke for hours in the House of Commons in order to push the upskirting debate past the 2.30pm limit.

If these claims are true, Choke blocked a bill to prevent sexual abuse that he didn’t even have the courtesy to attempt to understand. Meanwhile, media outlets repeat excuses that do not stand up to analysis or evidence.

These rank relics have a medieval approach to women’s rights. Get them out of parliament. Now.

Get Involved!

– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.

Featured image via Tim Loudon/ Flickr and Chris McAndrew/ Wikimedia

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed