The Tory who defended upskirting will get his knickers in a twist when he sees this protest
On Friday 15 June, Sir Christopher Chope blocked the progress of a law to make upskirting illegal. Although Chope later claimed not to know what upskirting is, his track record on both women and progressive politics is dire. It’s also Chope’s responsibility to understand what he’s objecting to. And as such, it’s difficult to feel sympathy for him becoming the poster boy of privacy violation.
People have found ways to fight back, though. Including one woman who thought of the most brilliant protest at Chope’s constituency office:
I’ve made a small protest of knicker bunting outside my MP Christopher Chope’s constituency office #upskirting #Chope #shame #christchurch #knickerstochope #upskirtingbill ‘no one should be able to photo my pants unless I want them to’ pic.twitter.com/y5vjnpncpK
— Lorna Rees (@thegobbledegook) June 16, 2018
“No one should be able to photo my pants unless I want them to.”
Lorna Rees – the mastermind behind the protest – thanked a number of people for inspiration:
Read on...
Inspired in part by @Craftivists who make brilliant gentle protests through craft (though this was rather flung together in anger and haste!).
— Lorna Rees (@thegobbledegook) June 16, 2018
btw – the brillant *actual* heroes trying to change the law and stand up for #upskirtingbill legislation are @beaniegigi @Wera_Hobhouse and people like @jessphillips. Friday was desperately frustrating. I hope my anti-Chope constituency pant protest shows solidarity.
— Lorna Rees (@thegobbledegook) June 17, 2018
Some people agreed that gentle protest was the best way forward. They also agreed Chope may have shot himself in the undies with his stunt. Because who, in future, could bring themselves to vote for someone so obviously pants?
Rees later made Chope’s publicly available address more widely known, so other people could protest him. One Twitter user objected to this:
Possibly he was worried someone might take pictures of Sir Chope without his permission?
Legacy
It’s unclear why Sir Chope did what he did. Maybe it was about parliamentary procedure and libertarian conservatism – two things he’s shown clear disinterest in throughout his career? Or maybe it was just another in a long line of moves that diminish the safety and equality of women?
Either way, Sir Chope has made himself the face of the issue. And as such, he can expect doctored images like this for the rest of his career (which hopefully won’t be very long):
Oh, and if you didn’t know already, he isn’t even a full knight. He’s a knights bachelor. Which is a lower rank of knight – one he’s somehow brought even lower.
Get Involved!
– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.
Featured image via Pschemp – Wikimedia / Chris McAndrew – Wikimedia
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
