The PFC is demanding an apology because Taylor questioned whether the victim of a British army killing in 1974, 27 year old John Pat Cunningham, actually had learning difficulties.
The interview was about defence secretary Gavin Williamson’s proposal for an amnesty for all Troubles related offences. Taylor mentioned the prosecution of former British soldier Dennis Hutchings for shooting Cunningham, as previously reported by The Canary.
The interviewer put it to Taylor:
He shot a man with learning difficulties.
whether he had learning difficulties or not is again a matter of contention.
He was not, however, challenged on this statement.
The PFC were furious with Taylor’s comments and tweeted:
This tweet should have included an apology 2 #IAmJohnPatCunningham family 4 appalling interview suggesting john pat didnt have learning difficulties. PFC in contact w/BBC today. 1) mtg needed w/family 2) public apology 3) memo 2 staff on sub judice guidelines https://t.co/m57P4HOH2u
— Pat Finucane Centre (@FinucaneCentre) July 6, 2018
The PFC state Cunningham:
had a learning disability and also had a fear of men in uniforms.
Furthermore, Cunningham’s learning disability is reported widely in the media. This includes articles on the BBC website. The PFC told The Canary that anyone questioning Cunningham’s mental condition has not look at it in any detail.
The Canary contacted the BBC about the PFC’s demands. A spokesperson said:
We will give careful consideration to the concerns of the Pat Finucane Centre and will respond in due course.
Dealing with the past
There’s not a simple solution to dealing with past offences in Northern Ireland. But comments like this from an experienced documentary filmmaker can only serve to bring further hurt to victims’ families.
– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.
Featured image Flickr/Tiocfaidh ár lá 1916
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?