• Donate
  • Login
Thursday, June 4, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result
  • Editorial
  • Explainer
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Environment
  • Feature
  • Food
  • Health
  • Science
  • Skwawkbox
  • UK

A Labour MP has come up with such a terrible idea even Jacob Rees-Mogg is supporting it

Emily Apple by Emily Apple
13 November 2018
in UK
Reading Time: 3 mins read
185 2
A A
0
Home UK
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

A Labour MP has had a truly terrible idea. In fact, it’s such a bad idea that even Jacob Rees-Mogg is supporting it. Lucy Powell is planning to introduce a bill to “tackle online hate, fake news and radicalisation”. So far, so good. But in order to do this, she believes the answer is to ban “secret” online groups with over 500 members.

The bill is being launched with crossbench support. Amongst its supporters are Rees-Mogg, Nicky Morgan and Anna Soubry.

Secret groups

Secret groups are closed groups that exist on platforms such as Facebook. They don’t show up in searches and can only be accessed by people in the group. Writing in the Guardian, Powell explained that:

Because these closed forums can be given a “secret” setting, they can be hidden away from everyone but their members. This locks out the police, intelligence services and charities that could otherwise engage with the groups and correct disinformation.

Luckily social media users exercised their freedom of speech to tell her why this is such a bad idea:

https://twitter.com/AbiWilks/status/1039495713548378112

https://twitter.com/edwardpoole1975/status/1039553970379923462

Other people pointed out how ridiculous the notion was given the nature of many private groups:

Didn't realise that the closed knitting group I'm in with members of over 50k from around the world was such a hateful place. You've not thought this through have you.

— Christine 🇬🇧 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (@ChristineSandf3) September 11, 2018

I'm in a closed group on Facebook that discusses how much we love David Suchet in Poirot. i didn't realise we were all being radicalised.

— Sarah (@HalflingSarah) September 11, 2018

Meaningless words

Powell’s bill plays into the use of meaningless words like “extremism” and “radicalisation”. Extremism is not defined under UK law. But it is widely known that it includes environmental campaigners, anti-fascists, and anti-arms trade protesters. The UK police run a domestic extremist database. Those included on it include journalists, politicians and protesters who’ve committed no criminal offence.

Many political groups organise using closed Facebook groups. As the Network for Police Monitoring (Netpol) pointed out:

This terrible proposal would further inhibit the kind of private, collective discussion and decision-making that is so fundamental to legitimate campaigners' ability to organise effectively and that is impossible when under constant online police and corporate surveillance https://t.co/4j4quUj1ZR

— Netpol (@netpol) September 11, 2018

And as many people pointed out, there is an issue with who gets to decide which groups are acceptable:

You say in your speach you want to monitor and censor misguided medical advice in a forum for parents. What power could let you do this that wouldn't allow you to censor private groups of abuse survivors, queer people, etc. etc.

— Emma (@geekethics) September 11, 2018

The media is so wonderful. Honest.

In her speech to parliament, Powell stated:

Our newspapers, broadcasters and other publishers are held to high standards, yet online groups, some of which have more power and reach than newspapers, are not held to any standards, nor are they accountable.

It is, however, somewhat ambiguous as to what those “high standards” are. Following the spike in hate crime during and just after the Brexit referendum, the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance accused the tabloid press of using “offensive, discriminatory and provocative terminology”.

A point many on social media also noted:

https://twitter.com/justonside/status/1039637716189818881

https://twitter.com/utopian_red/status/1039692023220109313

And as others highlighted, hate is not confined to closed groups:

https://twitter.com/markwhiley/status/1039501556868153344

A truly terrible idea

From the practicalities of enforcement to ideology, this is a truly terrible idea. Online hate needs to be condemned and addressed. But banning groups and censorship is not the answer. Powell needs to rethink. If nothing else, Rees-Mogg’s support of her bill should tell her everything she needs to know.

Get Involved!

– Support Netpol

– Support The Canary if you appreciate the work we do.

Featured image via YouTube and Wikimedia/Chris McAndrew

Share138Tweet87ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

Dundee and its unemployment woes won’t be turned around by a new museum and tourism alone

Next Post

Jeremy Corbyn brings the house down with a stunning attack on Theresa May and her ‘failing’ government

Next Post
Jeremy Corbyn and Theresa May

Jeremy Corbyn brings the house down with a stunning attack on Theresa May and her 'failing' government

Confused woman surrounded by racist cartoons

Political cartoonist claims not to know the history of political cartoons

Theresa May

News that the Tory government is betraying its own voters lands at the worst possible time

Michael Gove

The UK government's latest climbdown shows it still has vile inhumanity at its very core

Theresa May at PMQs after which there were angry scenes

Theresa May probably avoided the angry scenes after PMQs today

farage, badenoch, lowe
Analysis

Nigel Farage, Rupert Lowe, and Kemi Badenoch squabble over race to the bottom

by Maddison Wheeldon
4 June 2026
military ai
Analysis

Former spy-chief-turned-arms-firm-adviser says military AI can be moral in shock to nobody

by Joe Glenton
4 June 2026
What Roller Blinds Are Suitable for Commercial Spaces?
Lifestyle

What Roller Blinds Are Suitable for Commercial Spaces?

by Nathan Spears
4 June 2026
Israel
Analysis

Israel abducts Palestine international women’s football player

by HG
4 June 2026
UK
News

UK ‘special operations’ soldier died at base Iran attacked in March

by Joe Glenton
4 June 2026

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

Complaints and Corrections

About the Canary

Meet the Team

© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Ok

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart