The Department for Work and Pensions’ (DWP) sanctions regime has been subject to yet another damning report. This time, it shows that under Universal Credit, the system is looking out of control. And the worst could be yet to come.
The DWP: under the microscope
As writer Alex Tiffin spotted, the House of Commons Library has released a briefing paper called Universal Credit: why are sanction rates higher? The DWP’s flagship new benefit replaces six old ones (known as “legacy benefits“) with one payment. Currently, what’s known as “live service” Universal Credit has been rolled out in certain areas for new claims. Eventually, the DWP will move everyone onto “full service“, including those on legacy benefits.
The report looks at the sanction rates for people on Universal Credit compared to Jobseeker’s Allowance (JSA). The paper mainly deals with sanctions for people who are ‘searching for work’. And the results show that under Universal Credit, the DWP is sanctioning these people at alarming rates.
The report found that in December 2017, the DWP sanctioned 4.6% of Universal Credit claimants; this is versus 0.3% of JSA ones. But the devil is in the detail. Because the report just shows the figures for people the DWP says must look for work.
It found that of claimants searching for work:
- The DWP had sanctioned 8.2% of claimants looking for work in December 2017; this fell to 5.3% in May 2018.
- It sanctioned more under ‘live service’ Universal Credit (10%) than under full service (4%) in May 2018.
- In April 2018, sanction rates were 5% for Universal Credit live service compared to 1% for JSA.
- 73% of DWP sanctions for live service Universal Credit claimants between August 2015 and April 2018 were for “failing an interview requirement”.
- In April 2018, DWP sanctions for “failing an interview requirement” were 86% for live service Universal Credit. This is versus 29% for JSA.
The DWP says…
The report gave the DWP’s response to its findings. Minister Alok Sharma said:
People will say that under the legacy system the percentage of people being sanctioned was significantly less than for Universal Credit. It is a different system. To give you one example, one of the big reasons why referrals are made on sanctions is that people do not turn up for interviews. Under JSA, if we could not get in touch with you after five days you would effectively fall off the system… and you would not count. Under Universal Credit in that case you may potentially face a sanctions referral because what we would not want is for you to stop getting the additional elements in terms of your UC payment when it came to housing or children.
Read on...Support us and go ad-free
But the report shows that the DWP’s answer is not the whole story. Because it found that even taking out sanctions for “failing an interview requirement”, rates were still double under live service Universal Credit (0.8%) versus JSA (0.4%).
The report says there may be some reasons for these trends:
- Sanction rates under live service Universal Credit may be higher than full service due to claimants waiting for Work Capability Assessments (WCAs).
- Universal Credit has [pdf, p12] a more diverse range of claimants on it.
But it also notes it still has questions:
- Why is the rate of sanctions so high under Universal Credit compared to JSA?
- What are the consequences of sanctions on the likelihood of claimants finding work?
Ultimately, the report appears to end with a warning. It says:
[Universal Credit] could extend conditionality [sanctions] to up to 900,000 people not subject to conditionality under the ‘legacy’ system… Also, UC [Universal Credit] will apply conditionality to in-work claimants for the first time.
In other words, if people think the DWP’s sanctions regime is already bad – the worst could be yet to come.
Read the full report:
– Get involved with DPAC, fighting for disabled people’s rights.
Featured image via The Canary and UK government – Wikimedia
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?