The Media Reform Coalition’s (MRC) latest report proves that the UK media landscape badly needs improvements. As The Canary recently detailed, the report shows consistent failures on the part of the establishment and corporate press to cover the ‘antisemitism row’ properly. One might think that Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn’s media reform proposals would be back in the news as a result. But, alas, that is not the case. In fact, when Corbyn’s proposals were discussed they were bizarrely smeared as an attack on the ‘free press’.
Democratise the media
- Making the BBC more independent of government and more representative of the population.
- A levy on monopolies (like Facebook) to fund new competitors producing non-profit journalism.
- Offering charitable status for investigative and local public interest journalism.
Corbyn was undoubtedly influenced by the MRC’s own proposals, released in March 2018:
False, misleading and inaccurate
In the summer of 2018, it found: ’95 clear-cut examples of misleading or inaccurate reporting on mainstream television and online news platforms’ in media coverage of the antisemitism crisis.
Damning evidence of ‘misleading’, ‘distorted’ and ‘inaccurate’ reporting on the Labour antisemitism row
— The Canary (@TheCanaryUK) September 28, 2018
Lockley added that the MRC also found:
29 examples of ‘false statements or claims’. Many of these came directly from presenters and journalists. Six came from BBC news programmes. The highest was eight – from the Guardian.
Did any of the media outlets reply with a considered response to the findings? A follow-up piece from The Canary shows that, when trusted outlets such as the BBC and the Guardian had the opportunity to ‘restore trust’, they failed.
The Canary contacted the report’s co-author Dr Justin Schlosberg and asked him “how many media outlets have contacted you thus far about this report and which ones [are they]?”
Schlosberg, a senior lecturer in journalism and media at Birkbeck, replied on 4 October 2018:
In advance of publication I emailed specific journalists/editors at the Guardian, Mirror, HuffPost and Indy and I emailed generic news desks at The Times, BBC (plus Today and 5 Live), ITV and Channel 4.
I received only one brief reply containing a query about the report from the Guardian journalist.
The Canary searched for articles on the websites of the BBC, the Telegraph, and the Daily Mail but found no mention whatsoever of the MRC’s report. The Guardian did publish a critical letter from notable academics citing the report. But the Guardian did no reporting itself that could be found.
Media watchdog Media Lens also noticed the lack of coverage:
Over-concentrated UK media
The MRC’s website says:
Britain has one of the most concentrated media environments in the world, with 3 companies in control of 71% of national newspaper circulation and 5 companies in command of 81% of local newspaper titles.
And those were the stats before the Mirror‘s takeover of the Express and the Star. Corbyn’s proposals offer an opportunity to challenge the concentrated power maintained by the British media barons. And we must support radical, independent, and local press to have stories and perspectives that challenge the powerful, rather than echo their perspectives. If the lacklustre response to the MRC’s findings tells us anything, it’s that people in power won’t make these changes for us. So we must push for change ourselves.
– Tell your MP if you support Corbyn’s media reform proposals.
– Support independent journalism at The Canary if you appreciate our work, and please share our articles.
Featured image via Edinburgh Film Festival – YouTube
Images in article via Media Reform Coalition and Media Lens
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?