To say BBC Question Time‘s reputation isn’t what it used to be is an understatement. On 4 October, it damaged it further by having Isabel Oakeshott as a guest.
Call her a journalist
Oakeshott was formerly a political editor of the Sunday Times and editor-at-large at the Daily Mail. She infamously wrote Call me Dave – the biography of David Cameron which included the accusation that he made privileged, Etonian love to a severed pig’s head. That produced a lot of funny memes at the time, but it didn’t win any awards for journalism. Oakeshott later admitted that the Piggate allegation was only single-sourced and that the source:
could have been slightly deranged.
Oakeshott defended her story saying:
Hang on, this isn’t Watergate. I don’t think you would have put a team of researchers on one little anecdote.
It’s also worth pointing out she wrote the book with Lord Ashcroft – a Tory donor who had a serious falling out with Cameron. This was allegedly because Ashcroft was revealed as a tax-avoiding non-dom, and Cameron backed out on plans to give him a job in the Coalition government.
Oakeshott and no smoking barrels
Question Time should have expected a backlash to Oakeshott’s appearance. The same thing happened in June – that time because of Oakeshott’s relationship to the Cambridge Analytica scandal. Oakeshott accused Guardian journalist Carole Cadwalladr of “chasing unicorns” with a story showing links between Brexiteers, Russia, and Cambridge Analytica. It later turned out Oakeshott had been sitting on emails showing links between prominent Brexiteers and – you guessed it – Russian officials.
She’d had these for several months but claimed to be saving them for a book she was writing. She didn’t explain why other journalists pursuing the story were “chasing unicorns”.
But was Question Time used as a platform to question Oakeshott’s activities?
You can't really refer to Isabel Oakeshott as a "journalist" without adding the addendum of "who knowingly sat on potentially incriminating evidence while publicly deriding anyone who dared suspect said evidence even existed"#bbcqt missed that bit out of course. As always. pic.twitter.com/PwxhhAtVlh
— Graham Lithgow (@grahamlithgow) October 4, 2018
Where’s the effing questions time
People had a few complaints about Oakeshott featuring as a guest:
Isabel Oakeshott is on #bbcqt tonight. Isabel is essentially the mouthpiece of Belizean billionaire non dom Michael Ashcroft. That's fine… but could the BBC perhaps point this out rather than pretending that she's just some ordinary hack plying her trade.
— Otto English (@Otto_English) October 4, 2018
Can anyone tell me how the utterly discredited Isobel Oakeshott merits a place on the #bbcqt panel? She attacked a fellow journalist concerning a story for which she was found to be hoarding material that would be damaging to the government. No integrity whatsoever.
— Mark Hebden (@unionlib) October 5, 2018
Unsurprisingly, Oakeshott used her platform to say some pretty outrageous things:
Isabel Oakeshott spouting the ridiculous nonsense and outright lie, that it was Labour who brought about the financial crash in 2008. It was obviously the global financial banking crisis. That was a lie repeated over and over by the coalition to get through policies #BBCQT
— Jack Mendel (@Mendelpol) October 4, 2018
Isabel Oakeshott says “it took free schools in the coalition era before we got more good and outstanding schools.”
Since 2010, 66 free schools have either failed to open, partially closed or collapsed entirely, at a cost of £150m
That’s almost 10% of the total. #BBCQT
— Mikey Smith (@mikeysmith) October 4, 2018
"That was absolutely years ago", Isobel Oakeshott says about Theresa May's GO HOME vans.
So guess Windrush is irrelevant and that whole pesky Nazi thing should be forgotten. Despite the terrifying resurgence of the far-right. Which her paper encourages.#bbcqt
— Will Black (@WillBlackWriter) October 4, 2018
All’s well that Isabel
Still though, not everything Oakeshott said was bad. She did reveal that – if nothing else – a Corbyn government would be bad for the sort of people who spent the last decade benefitting from austerity:
— BBC Question Time (@bbcquestiontime) October 4, 2018
For the many, not the few.
– Join The Canary if you appreciate the work we do.
Featured image via screengrab
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?