• Donate
  • Login
Thursday, June 4, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result
  • Editorial
  • Explainer
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Environment
  • Feature
  • Food
  • Health
  • Science
  • Skwawkbox
  • UK

Judge denies Ghislaine Maxwell’s motions to toss sex charges

The Canary by The Canary
17 April 2021
in UK
Reading Time: 3 mins read
169 3
A A
2
Home UK
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

A judge has rejected Ghislaine Maxwell’s arguments to toss charges against her. The charges are that she recruited three teenage girls from 1994 to 1997 for then-boyfriend Jeffrey Epstein to abuse.

The case continues

US district judge Alison Nathan in Manhattan denied claims that a non-prosecution agreement for Epstein also protects Maxwell from prosecution. The non-prosecution agreement was reached with federal prosecutors several years ago. The judge also disagreed that some or all charges should be tossed out for a variety of other perceived flaws.

The judge, however, did agree that Maxwell can be prosecuted separately on perjury charges. And she said arguments the defence will make against new sex trafficking charges will be decided later.

In a written opinion, Nathan said that the law of contracts and prior precedents meant Manhattan federal prosecutors could charge Maxwell last year. This was despite a non-prosecution deal Epstein reached with federal prosecutors in Florida in 2007 seemingly protecting his employees too. The judge wrote:

Single-district plea agreements are the norm. Nationwide, unlimited agreements are the rare exception

The judge also rejected arguments that the charges had to be dismissed “because of the possibility of missing witnesses, failing memories, or lost records”. She said:

These are difficulties that arise in any case where there is extended delay in bringing a prosecution, and they do not justify dismissing an indictment

Publicity

The judge also rejected claims that pretrial publicity spoiled Maxwell’s chance at a fair trial or resulted from accusers who fabricated stories based on media allegations. She said:

The Court will not dismiss the indictment on Maxwell’s bare assertion that numerous witnesses are engaged in a perjurious conspiracy against her

And the Court will take all appropriate steps to ensure that the pretrial publicity in this case does not compromise Maxwell’s right to a fair and impartial jury.

Maxwell, 59, has pleaded not guilty to charges filed against her when she was arrested in July 2020 at a New Hampshire estate. Prosecutors claim this is where she was hiding from law enforcement. But defence lawyers say she went to spare her family and herself from media attention and threats.

Trafficking

Last month, prosecutors brought a superseding indictment to add sex trafficking charges. And they wanted to extend the alleged conspiracy between Maxwell and Epstein to a decade in length rather than three years in the 1990s. Prosecutors also added a fourth teenage victim to the charges.

The judge’s ruling came a day after a defence lawyer asked to delay a 12 July trial until mid-January. The lawyer said the rewritten indictment will require much more around-the-globe investigation that’s hampered by the coronavirus pandemic and the busy schedules of defence lawyers.

Epstein died in August 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges in a Manhattan federal jail.

Maxwell has repeatedly sought to be freed on bail, but Nathan has rejected the requests. The 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals is scheduled to hear arguments on an appeal of the bail rejections later this month.

One of Epstein’s alleged victims says that she was forced to have sex with prince Andrew while under the age of consent. Andrew was pictured with his arm around the woman in question with Maxwell standing behind them.

Andrew stepped down from royal duties over the scandal in 2019. Since then, American authorities have accused Andrew of not cooperating with their investigations into Epstein.

Tags: justice
Share128Tweet80ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

Indian variant could ‘scupper’ plans to ease coronavirus restrictions

Next Post

An expert has laid into the government’s ‘beyond belief’ testing programme’

Next Post
A test package

An expert has laid into the government's 'beyond belief' testing programme'

David Cameron

The Bullingdon boys have each other's backs as Tory corruption scandal deepens

Labour tells Rishi Sunak to stop ‘hiding’ and take ‘responsibility’ for Greensill deal

Labour tells Rishi Sunak to stop ‘hiding’ and take ‘responsibility’ for Greensill deal

David Cameron Andrew Marr and Rachel Reeves

Marr just tried to whitewash the Greensill scandal for the Tories

Noah Donohoe's campaign team

Noah Donohoe's justice campaign team is making sure he'll 'never be forgotten'

Comments 2

  1. Pingback: Judge denies Ghislaine Maxwell’s motions to toss sex charges - 1Gov.uK - The UK Alternative Government Website
  2. nobodylicksme says:
    5 years ago

    I would think that some of the men who “enjoyed” the company of these young people had a bit more compassion over their suffering than the witch Ghislaine Maxwell ever did.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Starmer
Analysis

Starmer finds his backbone as he stands up to Elon Musk “interfering in our politics”

by Maddison Wheeldon
4 June 2026
Coutinho
Analysis

Shadow equalities minister wants any explanation other than racism for Black maternal deaths

by Alex/Rose Cocker
4 June 2026
Reform UK councillor Tom Pickup
Uncategorized

Reform promotes councillor linked to genocidal WhatsApp group

by Willem Moore
4 June 2026
Palantir
News

MPs warn Palantir influence over British state is ‘unacceptable point of weakness’

by Joe Glenton
4 June 2026
Ben-Gvir
Global

Genocidal Ben-Gvir calls Lebanon ceasefire a ‘serious mistake’

by HG
4 June 2026

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

Complaints and Corrections

About the Canary

Meet the Team

© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Ok

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart