The worrying signs that the Tories want to rewrite British occupation in Ireland

Loyalist mural of soldiers
Support us and go ad-free

Senior Tories want to create an “official history” of the military occupation of Ireland.

The plans were first reported in the Telegraph on 13 November. Whitehall officials told the paper that the:

official history would be independent of ministers and would involve historians being appointed to produce a balanced historical record.

But critics say it will airbrush out British atrocities. Former Sinn Féin president Gerry Adams spoke out about the proposals. He stated:

This group of historians, appointed by the government, will they claim, be independent of the government. Mar dhea! Censorship and bias in the reporting of events and the interpretation and analyses of those events is a powerful weapon in any government’s arsenal.

Ex-Sinn Féin publicity director Danny Morrison told Irish News the move was a response to recent revelations. In particular, he said a rule change on suppressing particular groups being on television in the Republic of Ireland had rattled the British. The now removed Section 31 was a rule that effectively denied hardline Republican voices a platform on some Irish media. According to Morrison:

This is a reaction to the fact that certainly across Ireland, now that Section 31 is gone, that suppressed news in the 26 counties, they are now following the situation much more closely.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free
Revisionism

Morrison also said that the Tory plan is linked to documentaries like Unquiet Graves. The film looks at British collusion with murderous Loyalist gangs:

For example RTÉ put that film on by Sean Murray (Unquiet Graves) – documentaries like this and exposure of collusion upended the narrative that the IRA was the driving force behind the conflict.

Adams also argued that this “official history” is in response to the increased exposure of Britain’s actions in the north of Ireland:

They are also worried that the historic narrative is increasingly exposing Britain’s illegal and violent actions during those years.

Collusion

Morrison said the history of collusion had already been buried, including in the Stevens Report into collaboration between Loyalist groups, British state forces and the police:

We have had the Stevens report into collusion suppressed, we were told it would be public and he was only allowed to publish 17 pages out of 3,000 pages in his report.

He said recent reporting showed a different story to the official narratives:

If you were to look at the killings by the loyalists, the RUC, the UDR and the British army under the rubric of killings on behalf of the state, in support of the state and the status quo, the statistics of the conflict then look a lot different.

But as Adams pointed out:

However hard the British government seeks to do this; however many revisionist historians they employ to bolster Britain’s view of history, the case of Pat Finucane; the importation by British intelligence of South African sourced weapons for Loyalist groups; the three reports by John Stevens; the role of state agents like Brian Nelson, and of the Glenanne Gang; the deaths of hundreds of victims; and the countless official reports by the Ombudsman and others into state collusion, will continue to haunt the British government. No amount of historical revisionism will change this.

No justice, no peace

The British state’s urge to rewrite it own history is hardly new. The underhandedness of the Tory plan will compound the sense of unfairness and trauma for those in Republican communities. And without justice, no meaningful peace is likely.

Featured image – Wikimedia Commons/DColt

Support us and go ad-free

Do your bit for independent journalism

Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.

We need you to help out, if you can.

When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.

You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.

In return you get:

  • Advert free reading experience
  • Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
  • 20% discount from our shop

 

The Canary Fund us
  • Show Comments
    1. As is par for the course with this particular government, they can’t leave it alone. Not only can they not leave it alone, they deal with things in the most heavy handed way possible and with a contempt for the public. They think we are stupid and won’t know what they’re doing. This is why it’d be good if we had TV news that had the guts to report on this stuff but the BBC especially has been utterly emasculated. No mainstream news outlet will touch this either out of loyalty to the government or for fear of what will happen. It’s like the lack of reporting on Assange, the loaded reporting on the Salmond case and the jailing of Craig Murray. The government has put it’s hands round the throat of the press until they cannot report the truth any longer..

      1. The problem with the BBC is that they’re shitting themselves in case the culture minister, Nadine Dorries (there’s a contradiction in terms!) goes with public opinion and cancels the licence fee. If she did, that would probably be the only act she carries out I’d agree with.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.