A House of Lords amendment is a big step forward in holding the military to account

Commanding officers in the military will no longer be able to decide on serious crimes like rape if an amendment in the House Lords is approved by parliament. It comes as peers voted 210-190 to accept an amendment to the Armed Forces Bill. If approved, it’ll mean serious crimes will only be tried in the civilian system – a big change from the previous rules.
Individuals and organisations have lobbied for the change. Serving women are particularly vulnerable and may be helped by the new rule. For example, women have reported very high rates of sexual harassment and assault in the forces.
Civilian courts
Green Party peer Natalie Bennett was among the first to celebrate the news:
Defeat for government on #ArmedForcesBill: 210-190.
On amendment to ensure most serious crimes are generally tried in civilian courts if committed in UK, rather than by court martial.
Explanation from @cmjhqhttps://t.co/SKYZqxyYxl https://t.co/BmK1wuujXPRead on...
Support us and go ad-free— Natalie Bennett (@natalieben) November 23, 2021
Civilian authority
The Centre for Military Justice (CMJ) lobbied for the amendment. Recently, it laid out in a short explainer what its objections were. It stated:
First of all, and most importantly, how cases of rape, serious sexual assault, domestic abuse and child abuse should be dealt with.
CMJ believe serious offences “should always be dealt with by civilian authorities, not military (‘service’) ones.”
Serious cases
CMJ also said that since the army recruit deaths scandal at Deepcut Barracks a new principle had been set. This meant sudden deaths were a civilian matter. So, they asked, why not extend this to other issues?
If that principle is accepted for those kinds of serious cases, why not rape? Why not child abuse? The investigation of these kinds of offences does not need the investigating officer to have military experience.
Service police
CMJ said military police weren’t capable of investigating serious matters:
On the contrary, from the cases we have dealt with, and from our conversations with people across the forces, the service police are insufficiently prepared and experienced to handle such cases.
Victory
It tweeted that this was an important moment for victims of military sexual violence. The bill will now go back to the Commons for further debate:
This is huge news and a great result in the Lords. The Lords has recognised that there is no good reason to keep serious military sexual offences, where they occur in the UK, out of the civilian system. Fantastic result. Now back to the Commons again. https://t.co/QhHUnrOCKl
— Centre for Military Justice (@cmjhq) November 23, 2021
Needs work
Sexual abuse and bullying in the military remain an issue. As The Canary reported recently, an instructor at a military training camp was put on trial for punching recruits. Since that report, the corporal in question was found guilty and demoted.
Military justice systems still need a lot of work. However, this seems to be a step toward fairer treatment.
Featured image – Wikimedia Commons/Katy Blackwood
Support us and go ad-freeWe know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
-
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.