On 26 June, communities secretary James Brokenshire confirmed what the government describes as “a multi-billion pound boost to social housing”.
But deeper analysis reveals that the proposals fall laughably short of the mark.
Brokenshire announced the government is investing £1.67bn in ‘affordable’ homes. This funding will cover the whole of England apart from London as the government released a similar funding plan just for the capital in March 2018. Both announcements are part of the government’s overall £9bn investment in affordable homes.
Brokenshire states that the funds will deliver 23,000 ‘affordable’ homes across England. This includes 12,500 homes for social rent in high-cost areas. Additionally, the government is making a £1bn borrowing fund available for councils to fund extra house building.
Therefore, the government has so far committed to building 27,000 new ‘affordable’ homes in London and 23,000 in the rest of England, as part of its £9bn investment in affordable housing. Of these 50,000 homes, roughly 22,500 will be for social rent, 12,500 outside of London and 10,000 within the capital. These numbers could increase if councils apply to the additional borrowing fund.
Affordable vs. Social Housing
These prospective homes will be built in what the government defines as areas of “affordability pressure”. These are:
where there is a difference of £50 more per week between average private sector rents and social sector rents.
This £50 per week difference works out to £217.41 per month. But research by Trust for London states that the average rent for a two-bedroom property in the capital is £1,730 per month. Therefore, an affordable rented property would be available for around 80% of that figure which is £1,384 per month. Local authorities in London rent two-bedroom social housing properties at an average of £470 per month. This means an average £914 per month gap between affordable rented and social rented housing.
That gap suggests that any new affordable rents would cost over four times the level the government itself defines as creating “affordability pressure”.
Not even close
So, not counting ‘affordable’ homes, the government has committed to building 12,500 social rented properties outside of London. This pales in comparison to the demand.
Over 120,000 people are on the waiting list for social housing in Manchester alone. And Manchester council estimates that it will see a 60% increase in people requiring homelessness help in the next 3 years.
The same is true in London. The 10,000 socially rented homes to be built wouldn’t even halve the borough of Lambeth’s waiting list, which stands at over 22,000.
Half baked commitment
Strangely, the government’s commitment to building more social housing hasn’t translated into culling the controversial Right to Buy policy. Inside Housing estimates that 40% of properties which have been purchased through the scheme are now being rented in the private sector.
The government increased the discount available for tenants to purchase their property in 2012. Councils warn this has led to Right to Buy sales growing four-fold, with 11,649 social homes sold off in England during the last year alone. This amounts to over a third of the prospective new-build social homes. And that’s just one year. If the government continues to sell off social homes at the same rate, then – even if it fulfils this latest proposal – England’s social housing stock will still be worse off.
No laughing matter
At best, the government’s announcement is representative of a body which is completely out of touch with what it’ll take to solve England’s housing crisis. At worst, it is a cynical attempt to appease calls for investment.
Either way, it is no laughing matter.
– Support the Save Our Homes LS26 campaign in their bid to thwart the prospect of eviction.
– Follow the Save Chrisp Street Market Twitter for news about their campaign against regeneration in Tower Hamlets.
Featured image via Lydia/Flickr
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?