On BBC Question Time (BBCQT) on 22 November, the BBC yet again demonstrated favouritism to the voices of big business over those of ordinary working people.
Another panel leaning heavily towards big business
But absent from the panel were representatives of workers, union or otherwise. And Labour’s Clive Lewis surely cannot be a sufficient counterweight to a Tory minister, a right-wing journalist, a Tory-supporting business, and a former business representative.
This week's #bbcqt panel – we're on @BBCOne and @bbc5live from 10:45pm tonight – Conservative MP Karen Bradley and @labourlewis @IcelandRichard, Broadcaster Trevor Phillips and @JuliaHB1 pic.twitter.com/kxN5zt0cl7
Read on...Support us and go ad-free
— BBC Question Time (@bbcquestiontime) November 22, 2018
Meanwhile, people might acknowledge Trevor Phillips’s former position as a Labour representative on the London general assembly, or as chair for both the UK Equality and Human Rights Commission and the Commission for Racial Equality; or that, even though Phillips comes from business, the John Lewis Partnership is worker-friendly and employee-owned.
But both remain voices of the business community, whether framed as benevolent capitalists or not. And in a country of nearly 67 million people, there should be a greater range of opinion debating issues that affect all citizens.
Evidence of business bias
This isn’t just a one-off occurrence, though. Because there’s a consistent saturation of business representatives in BBC coverage.
Mike Berry of Cardiff University has documented this. He found that:
In both 2007 and 2012, across all programming, business representatives received substantially more airtime on BBC network news (7.5% and 11.1% of source appearances) than they did on either ITV (5.9% and 3.8%) or Channel 4 News (2.4% and 2.2%).
And when examining the BBC Six O’Clock News alone, he noted:
business representatives outnumbered trade union spokespersons by more than five to one (11 vs 2) in 2007 and by 19 to one in 2012.
Case study: the global financial crisis
As Berry suggests, during critical moments in British economic history, this imbalance has skewed the public policy debate in favour of business-friendly solutions.
For example, Berry notes how, during the most recent financial crisis:
The table below shows the sources featured during the intense six weeks of coverage following the collapse of Lehman Brothers.
Note that union voices commenting on the crisis are virtually non-existent relative to business and financial-sector representatives – many of whom arguably caused the crisis.
He concludes that:
Considering the impact of the issues on the UK workforce, and the fact that trade unions represent the largest mass democratic organisations in civil society, such invisibility raises troubling questions for a public service broadcaster committed to impartial and balanced coverage.
Other academics agree
Dr Tom Mills of Aston University argues along similar lines in his own research, believing that the general trend in BBC coverage is:
towards the interests and perspectives of powerful groups in society, especially those in Westminster, Whitehall and the City.
The BBC routinely allows politicians, political commentators and business elites to define the political and social agenda. This has arguably played some role in bringing us to the current political and constitutional crisis in which we now find ourselves.
The Canary contacted the BBC for comment but it had not replied by the time of publication.
The BBC needs a revolution
The weighting of BBCQT panels seems to fit in with a wider pattern of bias towards the business establishment, as the 22 November edition demonstrated.
It is difficult for the public to make informed decisions if it does not receive a variety of opinions. And unfortunately, that is the case today, with the mainstream media bombarding us with the opinions of one privileged community and sharing just a narrow ideological perspective.
It’s time we radically reformed and democratised the BBC.
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?