A coalition of extremist Brexit groups is emerging from out of the shadows. Be warned.

Opposimg sides outside of Parliament
Tom Coburg

An assortment of extreme Brexit organisations is re-emerging. Their aim? To promote a hard Brexit or ‘no deal’ situation. Some are relatively new; others have direct links to old-style Leave campaigners and their dubious technologies.

‘Better Brexit’

Better Brexit, which includes a testimonial by arch-Brexiteer Jacob Rees-Mogg MP, is a campaign organisation that:

actively promotes the UK’s withdrawal from the EU on a Canada + trade agreement or WTO [World Trade Organization] terms.

Prior to the Commons vote on Theresa May’s Brexit deal, one CNN reporter spotted this:

The Better Brexit’s data controller is listed as Voter Consultancy Ltd and “all processing is carried out by consent, under the legitimate interest of Kanto Systems”.

‘Voter consultancy’

Better Brexit is directly linked with Voter Consultancy Ltd, sharing the same address: 77 Victoria Street, Westminster, London, SW1H 0HW. The latter organisation is run by Thomas Borwick, who reportedly worked for data miners AIQ (partner of the discredited Cambridge Analytica, which came under investigation regarding its social media practices).

Borwick was Chief Technology Officer for Vote Leave (fronted by government minister Michael Gove and former foreign secretary Boris Johnson).

According to an OpenDemocracy investigation Borwick possesses the electoral roll from more than 200 local authorities across Britain – names, addresses and other details for every registered voter. Borwick also owns Kanto, which developed an election app used by Cambridge Analytica. Kanto had an agreement to provide software to SCL Elections, the parent of Cambridge Analytica. In October 2017, Borwick founded Disruptive (Communications Ltd) with former Tory and UKIP MP Douglas Carswell.

Meanwhile, several other key pro-Brexit players are at large.

‘Britain’s Future’

Britain’s Future (BF) states:

We are Britain’s Future. We are dedicated to making a positive, optimistic case for Brexit. A Brexit with a truly global outlook. We believe leaving the European Union represents a historic opportunity for our country. We must seize it.

BF publishes a range of stories that largely promote a hard Brexit or a no-deal situation and which are grouped under the headings: Trade, Innovation, Regulations and Relationships. BF rejects Theresa May’s deal, arguing instead for free trade under WTO rules and non-payment of the £39bn ‘divorce settlement’. Altogether, it offers 40 reasons not to back the deal. However, it admits that to achieve all 40 objectives requires further negotiation with the EU.

BF is edited by Tim Dawson, who has “written for The Telegraph, The Spectator and The I-Paper”. But apart from its writers, it provides no information as to who else is behind the group. Yet for a relatively unknown website, it boasts 4.7m viewings over three months.

Here are some of their ads targeting “constituents of target Labour MPs”, as listed by Observer journalist Carole Cadwalladr:

‘Brexit Facts 4EU’

BF4EU (Brexit Facts4EU) has been around since before the 2016 EU referendum, but has only recently come to attention. Its main resource is Brexit Index, which it claims “delivers the most definitive source of easily findable facts on all aspects of Brexit”. BF4EU also possesses a ‘Brexit Battle Pack and Toolbox’, which provides a collection of resources to target MPs and the media. The pack/toolbox describes Tory MP Anna Soubry as an ‘extremist’ (presumably because she supports a People’s Vote) and advocates that Tory Remainer Amber Rudd should resign her seat as MP. The bulk of the pack/toolbox contains advice and information on how to contact MPs and the media.

BF4EU is endorsed by a number of groups that promote a hard Brexit or No Deal. These include:

Allegedly, BF4EU is endorsed by Matthew Elliott, who joined with Paul Staines (aka ‘Guido Fawkes’) and others to develop a UK voter database. Elliott subsequently went on to head up Vote Leave and Brexit Central:


These new-wave pro-Brexit groups are, of course, complemented by the more well-known organisations, such as UKIP. Nor must we forget that old stalwart Leave.EU financier Arron Banks, who is also under investigation by multiple agencies:

The febrile debate by parliamentarians that is a consequence of gross government ineptitude will inevitably be complemented by hard-fought campaigns on all sides of the Brexit divide. But the tactics will likely differ from those adopted by the original Leave campaigns, given that both Leave.EU and Vote Leave were found to have acted illegally.

Nevertheless, this is still largely a battle between the right and progressives. And the gloves are well and truly off.

Featured image via Tiocfaidh ár lá 1916/Flickr Creative Commons.

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us