BBC Question Time panel get caught lying during attack on Diane Abbott

Diane Abbott, left, and journalist Isabel Oakeshott, right, on BBC Question Time
Support us and go ad-free

On 17 January, the supposedly unbiased BBC Question Time panel ganged up on shadow home secretary Diane Abbott, claiming that Labour was “way behind in the polls”. The show’s new host, Fiona Bruce, then joined the attack (led by right-wing columnist Isabel Oakeshott) to tell Abbott: “No, you’re behind Diane – definitely”.

But not for the first time, the BBC has been caught screening barefaced lies and political attacks without challenge. Though Abbott defended Labour – saying “we are kind of level-pegging” in the polls – it gets even worse for Bruce and Oakeshott. Because in most recent polls, Labour has actually been ahead of the Tories.

Way behind?

People instantly rinsed Oakeshott and Bruce’s dodgy statistics on Twitter.

Grassroots campaign group Momentum set the record straight by showing that Labour is ahead of the Tories in three of the five major polling companies’ reports:

Journalist Owen Jones also called on Oakeshott and the BBC to apologise:

A woman in the audience, meanwhile, claimed that “the jeers against Diane Abbott were worse than could be heard on the broadcast”.

Novara Media co-founder Aaron Bastani highlighted the unequal treatment of Abbott when it comes to numbers:

The Mirror‘s Kevin Maguire also chimed in, insisting:

Needless to say, numerous viewers found the panel’s behaviour totally unacceptable:

Independent media outlet Evolve Politics, meanwhile, said it had received no response from the BBC after confronting it with the facts:

BBC credibility

Establishment journalists seemingly saw one poll putting the Tories ahead, and chose to forget the rest. This is cherry-picking at its most damaging.

If the BBC wishes to retain any credibility, it must stop broadcasting politically motivated lies.

Featured image via screengrab via I Am Incorrigible

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. I stopped watching QT a long time ago. The audiences are picked by a member of Britain First and heavily biased to Brexit. It is simply a Tory Propaganda tool. And to dd insult to injury the presenters are highly overpaid

    2. I hardly think this is lying, I can’t imagine they all knew the truth and purposely lied. More like they got it wrong. Whatsmore the BBC is made up of thousands of employees, they aren’t all liars and not impartial…

      I am checking out the Canary as it was recommended to me by someone who claimed it was the “truth”. I will carry on for a few weeks but this isn’t exactly impartial. What is the proof they were lying?

    3. The BBC’s truth is very questionable, and I’m not imagining. Its was their social atitude of razing Diane Abbot which was so telling in the way facts were presented. I’m sure whoever sets policy in the BBC wouldn’t like to be treated like this. I’d like to know who these people are so its fair, and they have the same opportunity to stand in the public arena for us to observe.. Who are these people issuing directives from closed doors?
      Somehow I don’t they would want to be treated in the same manner Ms. Abbott was.
      I find the Canary has a basic truth about it that is hard to define, and I notice its the only online news with satirical humour.
      You don’t find these interviewers having the talent.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.