BBC Question Time panel get caught lying during attack on Diane Abbott

On 17 January, the supposedly unbiased BBC Question Time panel ganged up on shadow home secretary Diane Abbott, claiming that Labour was “way behind in the polls”. The show’s new host, Fiona Bruce, then joined the attack (led by right-wing columnist Isabel Oakeshott) to tell Abbott: “No, you’re behind Diane – definitely”.
But not for the first time, the BBC has been caught screening barefaced lies and political attacks without challenge. Though Abbott defended Labour – saying “we are kind of level-pegging” in the polls – it gets even worse for Bruce and Oakeshott. Because in most recent polls, Labour has actually been ahead of the Tories.
Way behind?
People instantly rinsed Oakeshott and Bruce’s dodgy statistics on Twitter.
Grassroots campaign group Momentum set the record straight by showing that Labour is ahead of the Tories in three of the five major polling companies’ reports:
This is scandalous 😠#bbcqt #DianeAbbott pic.twitter.com/gObm5Fugq2
— Momentum (@PeoplesMomentum) January 18, 2019
Read on...
Journalist Owen Jones also called on Oakeshott and the BBC to apologise:
This is completely false – Labour are slightly ahead in the polling average, and in the last two polls are 2 and 3 points ahead – and it's made all the worse by @HackneyAbbott being ridiculed over it. Both @IsabelOakeshott and the BBC should apologise. pic.twitter.com/xyupJXGSOe
— Owen Jones🌹 (@OwenJones84) January 18, 2019
A woman in the audience, meanwhile, claimed that “the jeers against Diane Abbott were worse than could be heard on the broadcast”.
Novara Media co-founder Aaron Bastani highlighted the unequal treatment of Abbott when it comes to numbers:
Let me get this straight. When Diane Abbott ‘gets the numbers wrong’ it means everyone can mock her and tell her she shouldn’t have a senior job.
When a white lady is wrong about the polls, and another one inaccurately says she’s right, nobody mentions a thing
🤔🤔🤔 #bbcqt
— Aaron Bastani (@AaronBastani) January 18, 2019
The Mirror‘s Kevin Maguire also chimed in, insisting:
Fiona Bruce’s ignorance or bias leaves BBC1 Question Time a Fake News propaganda machine. She owes Diane Abbott an apology and should’ve picked up Isabel Oakeshott https://t.co/cVAg8XTzmW
— Kevin Maguire (@Kevin_Maguire) January 18, 2019
Needless to say, numerous viewers found the panel’s behaviour totally unacceptable:
@BBCQT really should check facts, the information given out about polls last night was clearly false. Fiona Bruce was far too hasty, appeared to suggest Diane Abbott had no idea and that sort of mistake can be incredibly damaging in National TV.
— Liz Salter #FBPE (@lizsalter) January 18, 2019
So the god-awful Isabel Oakshott & Fiona Bruce both harangued Diane Abbott in saying Labour are behind in the polls.That is not true (see above) So maybe they should get their facts right before spreading fake news on the TV. No wonder we do not trust MSM journos anymore! #bbcqt
— Joanna Burns (@TheCakeStalker) January 17, 2019
Complaint from last night's #bbcqt gone in on two issues 1) How Dianne Abbott was treated 2) The factually incorrect claim on the polls by Isabel Oakeshotte and Fiona not correcting her and repeating it. Won't hold my breath! pic.twitter.com/DWXJksbrxB
— Nicola Marie 🌹 (@nikpet1) January 18, 2019
Independent media outlet Evolve Politics, meanwhile, said it had received no response from the BBC after confronting it with the facts:
The BBC is an utter joke.
We spoke to the BBC Press Office at 09:00 this morning. We emailed them at 09:17 with detailed proof that Fiona Bruce had lied.
We STILL haven't received a response. https://t.co/hADJYMbxuS
— Evolve Politics (@evolvepolitics) January 18, 2019
BBC credibility
Establishment journalists seemingly saw one poll putting the Tories ahead, and chose to forget the rest. This is cherry-picking at its most damaging.
If the BBC wishes to retain any credibility, it must stop broadcasting politically motivated lies.
Featured image via screengrab via I Am Incorrigible
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
-
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.
I stopped watching QT a long time ago. The audiences are picked by a member of Britain First and heavily biased to Brexit. It is simply a Tory Propaganda tool. And to dd insult to injury the presenters are highly overpaid
Out of interest who is that member (of Britain First)? I watch QT and this would make a difference to me. Of course, proof would be essential.
I hardly think this is lying, I can’t imagine they all knew the truth and purposely lied. More like they got it wrong. Whatsmore the BBC is made up of thousands of employees, they aren’t all liars and not impartial…
I am checking out the Canary as it was recommended to me by someone who claimed it was the “truth”. I will carry on for a few weeks but this isn’t exactly impartial. What is the proof they were lying?
The BBC’s truth is very questionable, and I’m not imagining. Its was their social atitude of razing Diane Abbot which was so telling in the way facts were presented. I’m sure whoever sets policy in the BBC wouldn’t like to be treated like this. I’d like to know who these people are so its fair, and they have the same opportunity to stand in the public arena for us to observe.. Who are these people issuing directives from closed doors?
Somehow I don’t they would want to be treated in the same manner Ms. Abbott was.
I find the Canary has a basic truth about it that is hard to define, and I notice its the only online news with satirical humour.
You don’t find these interviewers having the talent.