On 17 January, the supposedly unbiased BBC Question Time panel ganged up on shadow home secretary Diane Abbott, claiming that Labour was “way behind in the polls”. The show’s new host, Fiona Bruce, then joined the attack (led by right-wing columnist Isabel Oakeshott) to tell Abbott: “No, you’re behind Diane – definitely”.
But not for the first time, the BBC has been caught screening barefaced lies and political attacks without challenge. Though Abbott defended Labour – saying “we are kind of level-pegging” in the polls – it gets even worse for Bruce and Oakeshott. Because in most recent polls, Labour has actually been ahead of the Tories.
People instantly rinsed Oakeshott and Bruce’s dodgy statistics on Twitter.
Grassroots campaign group Momentum set the record straight by showing that Labour is ahead of the Tories in three of the five major polling companies’ reports:
— Momentum (@PeoplesMomentum) January 18, 2019
Journalist Owen Jones also called on Oakeshott and the BBC to apologise:
This is completely false – Labour are slightly ahead in the polling average, and in the last two polls are 2 and 3 points ahead – and it's made all the worse by @HackneyAbbott being ridiculed over it. Both @IsabelOakeshott and the BBC should apologise. pic.twitter.com/xyupJXGSOe
— Owen Jones🌹 (@OwenJones84) January 18, 2019
A woman in the audience, meanwhile, claimed that “the jeers against Diane Abbott were worse than could be heard on the broadcast”.
Novara Media co-founder Aaron Bastani highlighted the unequal treatment of Abbott when it comes to numbers:
Let me get this straight. When Diane Abbott ‘gets the numbers wrong’ it means everyone can mock her and tell her she shouldn’t have a senior job.
When a white lady is wrong about the polls, and another one inaccurately says she’s right, nobody mentions a thing
— Aaron Bastani (@AaronBastani) January 18, 2019
The Mirror‘s Kevin Maguire also chimed in, insisting:
Fiona Bruce’s ignorance or bias leaves BBC1 Question Time a Fake News propaganda machine. She owes Diane Abbott an apology and should’ve picked up Isabel Oakeshott https://t.co/cVAg8XTzmW
— Kevin Maguire (@Kevin_Maguire) January 18, 2019
Needless to say, numerous viewers found the panel’s behaviour totally unacceptable:
@BBCQT really should check facts, the information given out about polls last night was clearly false. Fiona Bruce was far too hasty, appeared to suggest Diane Abbott had no idea and that sort of mistake can be incredibly damaging in National TV.
— Liz Salter #FBPE (@lizsalter) January 18, 2019
So the god-awful Isabel Oakshott & Fiona Bruce both harangued Diane Abbott in saying Labour are behind in the polls.That is not true (see above) So maybe they should get their facts right before spreading fake news on the TV. No wonder we do not trust MSM journos anymore! #bbcqt
— Joanna Burns (@TheCakeStalker) January 17, 2019
Complaint from last night's #bbcqt gone in on two issues 1) How Dianne Abbott was treated 2) The factually incorrect claim on the polls by Isabel Oakeshotte and Fiona not correcting her and repeating it. Won't hold my breath! pic.twitter.com/DWXJksbrxB
— Nicola Marie 🌹 (@nikpet1) January 18, 2019
Independent media outlet Evolve Politics, meanwhile, said it had received no response from the BBC after confronting it with the facts:
The BBC is an utter joke.
We spoke to the BBC Press Office at 09:00 this morning. We emailed them at 09:17 with detailed proof that Fiona Bruce had lied.
We STILL haven't received a response. https://t.co/hADJYMbxuS
— Evolve Politics (@evolvepolitics) January 18, 2019
If the BBC wishes to retain any credibility, it must stop broadcasting politically motivated lies.
Featured image via screengrab via I Am Incorrigible
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?