Not to be outdone by the Mail, Sky News does its own hatchet job on Jeremy Corbyn

Sophy Ridge and Jeremy Corbyn
Support us and go ad-free

The Mail on Sunday published an absolute hatchet job on Jeremy Corbyn on 10 February. Not to be outdone, Sky News aired another during Ridge on Sunday.

But the outlet’s attack on the Labour leader came crashing down almost as quickly as the Mail‘s did.

Not on my watch

Sophy Ridge interviewed Tony Blair on 10 February. After the show, she took to the Sky News website to wax lyrical about the man who conspired with the US to destroy Iraq. She was fawning:

Whatever you think of his politics, Tony Blair is a refreshing person to interview because he engages with whatever questions you ask without trying to bat them away (and makes me realise how rarely that happens in the world of politics).

One of the topics Ridge ‘engaged’ in with Blair was antisemitism in Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party. Never one to ‘bat away’ this particular subject, Blair quickly rolled out an antisemitic trope to argue his point. He said that he sees antisemitism in “parts of the left” in their “attitudes to the state of Israel”. Conflating Jewish people with Israel is an antisemitic trope. He also claimed the Labour leadership hasn’t been “robust enough” on the issue. Blair then shared this nugget:

Can you imagine when I was leader of the Labour Party having a conversation with me about whether antisemitism was in the Labour Party or not? We wouldn’t even have that conversation.

So, according to Blair, antisemitism didn’t raise its ugly head in the party when he was leader enough to merit a conversation. There’s just one problem with that.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free
Blair’s antisemitism

As Tory Fibs argued on Twitter, accusations of antisemitism in Labour did happen on Blair’s watch:

The “evidence” includes the party facing flak for antisemitism over an attack poster it created about then-Conservative leader Michael Howard. It also features the criticism Blair faced for not taking decisive action over the alleged antisemitic targeting of his “personal fund-raiser” Lord Levy. It even includes a reminder that Luciana Berger condemned the UK’s political parties, including the Labour Party, for their “approach” to immigration, claiming it “has a lot to say for the rise in not only anti-Semitism but any form of racism directed at immigrants” in 2005.

In Sky News‘s Ridge on Sunday interview, Blair voiced support for Berger. She is currently at loggerheads with her constituency Labour Party over her politics and the issue of antisemitism. The former Labour leader expressed disbelief that Berger could be in that position.

Media fail

As Tory Fibs says though, Ridge didn’t challenge Blair on his claim that antisemitism wasn’t a problem when he held the reins. So, if no-one in the media has had a ‘conversation’ with the former Labour leader about it, it’s not because it wasn’t an issue. It’s just that the British media is as shitty now as it’s always been at doing its job. When it comes to war-hungry, media mogul-friendly neoliberal politicians, the British press rarely holds them to account.

Featured image via liarpoliticians2 – YouTube / The Sun – YouTube

Support us and go ad-free

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. You can tell Ridge doesn’t read widely because she misses many opportunities to shed light on a myriad of issues.

      I expect her version of reading widely is reading lots of political memoirs and guzzling mainstream journalistic analyses. Yet these books don’t scrutinise what has become a cloaked hydrid political/financial system.

      She drinks from a very shallow pool and it shows in her questioning.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.