CORRECTION: This article was corrected on 2 May 2019 to make it clear that Gareth Peirce acted for Gerry Conlon not all of the Guildford Four and that others were also involved in uncovering the evidence that led to the Appeals and the subsequent police investigation that led to the quashing of their convictions.
A convicted bomber has told an inquest the names of those he claims were responsible for the 1974 Birmingham pub bombings. 21 people died and more than 200 were injured in the atrocity. Yet there are historical claims that Special Branch knew the identities of the real bombers going back to 1975 – the year that the Birmingham Six were convicted
But to fully understand what happened to the Birmingham Six we need to examine certain events prior to and after their prosecution.
The cover-up begins
The Balcombe Street Gang – Martin O’Connell, Edward Butler, Harry Duggan and Hugh Doherty – were accused of carrying out a series of bombings on behalf of the IRA. But it was at their trial in 1977 that Martin ‘Joe’ O’Connell made a very revealing statement in relation to the Guildford Four:
Despite that statement, the Guildford Four continued to languish in jail. And Giuseppe Conlon, the father of one of the four and who together with six others known as the Maguire Seven, had been caught and jailed in the dragnet, tragically died in prison.
Truth comes out
Over the following years, Gareth Peirce, a solicitor acting for Gerry Conlon, one of the Guildford Four, conducted further investigations into the prosecution case. Alongside others, she was able to find enough evidence to warrant an appeal hearing.
In 1989, at the Old Bailey, police evidence against the Guildford Four was shown to have been entirely “fabricated” and based – as Judge Lane put it – on “lies”. Defendants’ alibis were also ignored by police including:
- On the night of the attacks, Richardson was in London seeing the band Jack the Lad at the South Bank Polytechnic.
- Armstrong and Hill also presented alibis, the latter placing him in Southampton.
- Witness Charles Burke placed Conlon at a London hostel (but this was concealed by the prosecution).
Given what happened with the Guildford Four, a re-examination of the prosecution of the Birmingham Six was perhaps inevitable. And in 1991, the Birmingham Six – Hugh Callaghan, Patrick Joseph Hill, Gerard Hunter, Richard McIlkenny (now deceased), William Power and John Walker – appeared in court. All but one were represented by Peirce.
At the end of the lengthy appeal hearing the judges concluded:
So far as the police evidence is concerned, the fresh evidence shows, in the absence of any explanation, that Superintendent Reade, D.S. Morris, D.C. Woodwiss and D.C. Langford were at least guilty of deceiving the court.
The Birmingham Six were released and their convictions quashed. Superintendent George Reade and two other police officers were charged with perjury and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice but were never brought to trial.
What really happened
After the appeal decision, the six gave their version of events, including accounts of beatings and torture by police and prison officers:
Some 16 years later, Patrick Hill blamed the police for the cover-up and asserted that Gavin and Murray (by then both deceased) as well as three others who were ‘free men’ in Ireland, were responsible for the bombings. McLoughlin died in 2014.
Special Branch knew the names
added that World in Action had:n 2016, former Labour MP Chris Mullin
obtained a document from the special branch archive which was a precis of interviews with a man who names several of the pub bombers. Remarkably, the police chose to take no action. To do so, of course, would have meant admitting that they had just put away the wrong people. The Criminal Records Office reference on the file is 10368/74.
And that’s not all.
In September 2016, the court of appeal ruled there was evidence that the police knew in advance that the IRA were planning the Birmingham bombings:
The families of the victims – those killed or injured, and those who were wrongly accused – deserve to know the truth about what happened. Otherwise, justice will not have been served.
Do your bit for independent journalism
Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.
We need you to help out, if you can.
When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.
You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.
In return you get:
- Advert free reading experience
- Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
- 20% discount from our shop